Влияние корпоративных новостей на рыночную стоимость компаний
Both, business and academic communities agree that corporate news do affect the company market value. Empirical data shows that once released in the open, corporate news often lead to a rather predictable investor reaction. This investor reaction depends on a great number o factors: whether the news is good or bad, what type of corporate event has lead to the news, how broad is the analyst coverage of the company, what were the preceding company and analyst forecasts, prevailing stock market dynamics at the time, type of company shares, and a dozen of other factors. In our work, we attempted to put together disjoint empirical data, filter out the most significant common factors, determine their influence on the company value, and come up with a coherent big picture. Thereby we have developed a conceptual model that describes what kind of news and under what conditions will influence the company stock price this way or the other. We also propose a qualitative methodology for estimating the influence of news on the stock price. Our model and methodology are meant to help companies to better anticipate market reaction to their corporate announcements, and therefore correct possible negative impact leading to overall more efficient value based management.
Capital structure is one of key company value factor, so it is important to identify its determinants. Existing studies of Russian companies dedicated to capital structure puzzle use only publicly available data therefore ignore a number of important factors, including behavioral ones. Therefore, the current paper uses survey of people responsible for financial decision-making. In addition to choose statistically significant determinants the paper discusses the possibility of using factor analysis to identify groups of factors influencing the choice of funding.
Recently there was a growing body of literature that take into account irrationality of economic agents. Current paper dedicates to the revies of empyrical studies of behavioral capital structure theory named managers personal qualities influence. The topicality of this theory research is determined by its complimentarity with the other traditional and behavioral theories.
The paper examines the structure, governance, and balance sheets of state-controlled banks in Russia, which accounted for over 55 percent of the total assets in the country's banking system in early 2012. The author offers a credible estimate of the size of the country's state banking sector by including banks that are indirectly owned by public organizations. Contrary to some predictions based on the theoretical literature on economic transition, he explains the relatively high profitability and efficiency of Russian state-controlled banks by pointing to their competitive position in such functions as acquisition and disposal of assets on behalf of the government. Also suggested in the paper is a different way of looking at market concentration in Russia (by consolidating the market shares of core state-controlled banks), which produces a picture of a more concentrated market than officially reported. Lastly, one of the author's interesting conclusions is that China provides a better benchmark than the formerly centrally planned economies of Central and Eastern Europe by which to assess the viability of state ownership of banks in Russia and to evaluate the country's banking sector.
The paper examines the principles for the supervision of financial conglomerates proposed by BCBS in the consultative document published in December 2011. Moreover, the article proposes a number of suggestions worked out by the authors within the HSE research team.