Дискурсивный анализ межкультурного конфликта
The article presents discourse analysis of media texts concerning the intercultural (diplomatic) conflict on both macro- and micro- levels. The research shows that in conflict situations official spokesmen prefer to use inductive reasoning in argumentation while journalists orient towards deductive and emotional reasoning. Discourse micro-analysis reveals that the sources of intercultural conflict are historical perspectives of two parties, legal system differences, and involvement of law enforcement agents in conflict resolution.
The article is about the intercultural communication.
The research applied for research abilities of critical discourse analysis for new religious movements’ analysis. A long tradition of religion research in social sciences had a lot of theoretical issues. In this paper we show how theory is used for empirical survey.
The article covers versions of intercultural communication modeling and their implications for intercultural communication discourse modeling. An intercultural communication discourse integrates both elements of an intercultural communication system (Self- Other), and their dynamics. As a result, an intercultural communication discourse model is viewed as a cyclic model of the language personality development.