Article
Вызовы и угрозы постсовременности как системный инструментарий политического режима в России
Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология. 2007. № 1. С. 36-41.
Similar publications
Алюшин А. Л., Порус В. Н. В кн.: Власть. Очерки современной политической философии Запада.. М.: Наука, 1989. С. 95-127.
Added: May 10, 2013
Радаев В. В. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2009. № 03.
Added: Jan 11, 2013
Паин Э. А. В кн.: Идеология «особого пути» в России и Германии: истоки, содержание, последствия. М.: Три квадрата, 2010. С. 266-294.
Added: Aug 21, 2013
Балаян А. А. ЦенÑÑ Ð¸ÑÑледований модеÑнизаÑии. СеÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¿ÑепÑинÑов. ÐвÑопейÑкий ÑнивеÑÑиÑÐµÑ Ð² СанкÑ-ÐеÑеÑбÑÑге, 2012. â М-29/12.
Added: Oct 21, 2012
Семин В. Г. В кн.: Инновации на основе информационных и коммуникационных технологий. Материалы Международной научно-практической конференции (2010). М.: МИЭМ, 2010. С. 601-602.
Added: Apr 27, 2012
Скиперских А. В. Политика и общество. 2014. № 6. С. 682-688.
Added: Sep 28, 2014
It is commonplace that a sovereign state is a prerequisite to democracy. But not all states are alike, each having different resources, capacities, priorities, properties, and so forth. What kinds of states and what particular features are conducive to democracy or autocracy? How do different types of stateness and their dynamics relate to different trajectories of regime transformation in post-communist countries? In light of the significant debate in comparative politics regarding the importance of structural and procedural (actor-oriented) factors in democratization and democratic consolidation, we address the effect of stateness on regime transformations in a broad framework, allowing us to specify the role of structural conditions and the decisions of key political actors in post-communist regime change. The focus of this research is empirical, implementing a combination of qualitative comparative and multivariate statistical methods in order to study a sample of post-communist countries from the two past decades. This Working Paper is an output of a research project implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics.
Added: Aug 27, 2012
Чугров С. В., Кокарева А. Н., Красин Ю. А. и др. Полис. Политические исследования. 2012. № 2. С. 117-140.
Added: Aug 28, 2012
Черных А. И. Политическая теория и политический анализ. WP14. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. № 03.
Added: May 3, 2012
Татарко А. Н. Психология образования в поликультурном пространстве. 2012. Т. 17. № 1. С. 47-55.
Added: Sep 12, 2012
Таллинн: Таллинн, 2012.
Added: Dec 26, 2012
Savelieva I. M. Humanities. HUM. Basic Research Programme, 2011. No. 02.
This study researches some of the most recent theories (elaborated by historians and social scientists) applied to the practice of historical research. The object of this research includes ideas, concepts, notions, methods of scholarly analysis of past social reality, as well as the emergence of new interdisciplinary fields, mutual borrowings and interventions. In this connection, the opposite process — the historization of some very disparate disciplinary discourses — is briefly addressed. It includes especially historical aspects of anthropology and sociology in the coming century. The research is based on information from journals specialized in history and theory, on leading history journals which demonstrate the state of art in various research areas, on sociological journals publishing material on historical sociology and on monographs from 1995—2010.
Added: Apr 12, 2012
Valletta: ELRA, 2010.
Added: Dec 17, 2012
Скиперских А. В. Свободная мысль. 2005. № 8. С. 119-203.
Added: Oct 28, 2014
Черных А. И. Политическая теория и политический анализ. WP14. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. № 04.
Added: May 11, 2012
Тулякова И. И., Бочкарева Н. С. Мировая литература в контексте культуры. 2008. № 3(1). С. 150-154.
Added: Dec 11, 2014