Вишневский А. Г. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 1999. Т. 8. № 4. С. 5-21.
Added: Oct 8, 2012
Якунин В. И., Аникеева А. С., Ахметзянова И. Р. и др. М.: Экономика, 2007.
Added: Oct 24, 2012
Харькова Т. Л. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 1999. Т. 8. № 4. С. 81-91.
Added: Oct 8, 2012
Ионин Л. Г. Политическая теория и политический анализ. WP14. Высшая школа экономики, 2010. № 03.
Added: Mar 11, 2013
Храмова М. Н. В кн.: Миграционные мосты в Евразии. Сборник докладов и материалов II международной научно-практической конференции «Регулируемая миграция – реальный путь сотрудничества между Россией и Вьетнамом в XXI веке» и IV международной научно-практической конференции «Миграционный мост между Россией и странами Центральной Азии: актуальные вопросы социально-экономического развития и безопасности». М.: Экон-Информ, 2012. С. 44-48.
Added: Jan 11, 2013
Frejka T., Zakharov S. V. MPIDR Technical Report. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, 2012. No. WP2012-027.
The transformation of traditional childbearing patterns of early family formation to later family formation characterized recent fertility trends in Russia. These were intrinsically interwoven with fundamental changes in all aspects of life of young people in the 1990s and the 2000s. The past quarter century was also marked by concern with low fertility and attempts to increase fertility in the early 1980s and the late 2000s. The family policies of the 1980s failed to raise fertility. Preliminary analyses indicate that the fate of the 2007 policies could be similar. In both cases the main emphasis was on material birth and child benefits, parental leaves and child care. Presumably insufficient attention was devoted to improving living conditions of young people and promoting gender equality. Will government efforts to raise fertility during the 2010s be sufficiently effective to offset economic and social forces challenging childbearing? As of 2012 the outlook for a future fertility increase does not appear hopeful.
Added: Dec 25, 2012
Sakevich Victoria I., Denisov B. P. Sociology. SOC. Высшая школа экономики, 2014. No. WP BRP 42/SOC/2014.
The paper considers the changes in major proximate determinants of fertility in Russia within the framework of demographic transition theory and Bongaarts approach to fertility analysis. After World War II Russian fertility became fully controlled process. The complex interplay of abortion and contraception during the Soviet period resulted in a very high abortion level. Russian government has almost never supported and promoted family planning as alternative to abortion. However couple's preferences of small offspring appeared more powerful than the will of authorities. Current trends show that albeit lack of governmental support the society itself is evolving towards more humanistic and effective birth control. Estimates made upon recent surveys' data confirm the validity of official statistics and thus the reality of favorable trend of abortion decline.
Added: May 13, 2014
Кадырова Э., Маннанова Г., Миннигалеева Г. А. и др. Туймазы: РОО КРЦП «Мои года – мое богатство», 2011.
Added: Dec 13, 2012
Зороастрова И. В. В кн.: Права женщин и институты гендерного равенства в регионах России. М.: МАКС Пресс, 2010. С. 97-136.
Added: Sep 14, 2012
Рыбальченко С. И., Прокофьева Л. М., Юрьев Е. М.: М-Студио, 2012.
Added: Jan 30, 2013
Хорева О. Б. В кн.: Государственная и муниципальная социальная политика. М.: КноРус, 2011. Гл. 4.4. С. 480-487.
Added: Feb 19, 2013
Вып. 1. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2009.
Added: Oct 27, 2012
Aistov A. Education. EDU. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 5.
This research focuses on estimating the signalling role of education on the Russian labour market. Two well-known screening hypotheses are initially considered. According to first of these, education is an ideal filter of persons with low productivity: education does not increase the productivity of a person, but it does give him the possibility to signal about his innate productivity via an educational certicate. The second of these hypotheses admits that productivity actually does increase during the period of study, but nevertheless the main objective of getting an education is to acquire a signal about one's productivity. Information theory suggests that employees use education signals during the hiring processes whereby employers screen potential employees. Employers and other categories of self-employed workers are usually not screened by the labour market via their educational attainments. Comparison of the returns to education of employees vs. self-employed workers could show the difference between the returns to signals and the returns to human capital. Yet another way to understand the signals is to consider the time dynamics of the returns to education for employees staying in the same firm. This helps us to answer the question about whether the signals are valuable only during the hiring process, or whether they remain valuable during the whole experience with the firm. This research is based on the Mincerian-type earnings functions, estimated on RLMS-HSE and NOBUS data. On the basis of the available information, we cannot say that the returns to signals and human capital differ significantly in Russia. Nevertheless we can say that, for the majority of men, the return to educational signals decreases with time spent in the same firm, while we observe the opposite for women.
Added: May 15, 2012
Черных А. И. Политическая теория и политический анализ. WP14. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. № 03.
Added: May 3, 2012
Горный М. Б. Телескоп: журнал социологических и маркетинговых исследований. 2011. № 2. С. 14-24.
Added: Feb 7, 2013
Вып. 1. М.: Некоммерческая исследовательская служба «Среда», 2011.
Added: Feb 7, 2013
Edited by: А. Михайлов Вып. 14. М.: Социологический факультет МГУ, 2012.
Added: Mar 14, 2013
Added: Aug 23, 2012
Казун А. Д., Байтимерова С. И., Богомазова Л. В. и др. Медиаальманах. 2018. Т. 88. № 5. С. 82-91.
Added: Dec 14, 2018
Аистов А. В., Леонова Л. А. ÐÐ°ÑÑÐ½ÑÐµ Ð´Ð¾ÐºÐ»Ð°Ð´Ñ Ð»Ð°Ð±Ð¾ÑÐ°ÑÐ¾ÑÐ¸Ð¸ ÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÑÑÐ²ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð·Ð° Ð¸ Ð¼Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ»Ð¸ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÑÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸ÐºÐ¸. P1. ÐÐ¸Ð¶ÐµÐ³Ð¾ÑÐ¾Ð´ÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ ÑÐ¸Ð»Ð¸Ð°Ð» ÐÐÐ£ ÐÐ¨Ð, 2010. â Р1/2010/04.
Added: May 21, 2012