Особенности когнитивной интерпретации при реконструкции событий жизни индивида
This article examines the different ways of the reconstruction of true and false memories The impact of the external and internal factors on the memory is discussed.
This article examines the different ways of the reconstruction of true and false memories: purposeful rethinking of the experience and the distortion of memories. The impact of the external and internal factors on the memory is discussed.
The article substantiates the concept of quantitative assessment of knowledge uncertainty in accident reconstruction tasks based on application of mathematical tools of the fuzzy set theory allowing considering an uncertainty of initial data caused for instance by varying resistance to the motion of investigated objects at the apex stages of the contact–separation processes. The application of the mathematical tools of the fuzzy set theory can substantially expand the potential of applying the methodology to the automobile and technical expertise and provide the enhancement of authenticity and improve the accuracy of making conclusions about the accident reconstruction results.
Cultural memory may be best understood in the focus of individual and social, collected together when the man/woman is called to illustrate his\her biography of society in its heterogeneity and complexity. In this context, public and private gender can be considered as a determining factor. The history of women as a parallel story that recovers forgotten facts, of course, confirms this view. But behind this apparent memory technology actually hiding a gender framework of interpretation and transmission of acts that depend on conventional ethno-cultural codes and models. Therefore, individual and group narrative allow us to see the articulation of memory dependence on gender, ethnicity, class, and sexuality, as it is linked in B. Smith and N. Yuval-Davis. Identity, whether individual or cultural, becomes history, stretching from the past into the present and future human attaches to the group, constructed on the basis of gender and related markers of identity.
In this article there is an analysis of positions of various authors which exist in science literature about an issue on the rights arising with regard to the object of a public-private partnership agreement, as well as a characteristic of norms of Russian law which cover the matter in question and analysis of some problematic issues arising in process of construction and application of the governing norms in practice.