РЕАЛИЗАЦИЯ ПРАВА ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬНОЙ ИНИЦИАТИВЫ В СОВРЕМЕННОЙ РОССИИ: ПРАВОВАЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТАЦИЯ, ПРОБЛЕМЫ, ПРАКТИКА
This article is dedicated to overlook regulatory framework and realization of the constitution right of the legislative initiative in present Russia. The problems of understanding the right of the legislative initiative are being researched in the article and there is given an official position to this question, expressed in Art. 107 of the Regulations of the State Duma. It is noted, that in the Russian legislative process the given right is correlated with the legislative duty of the State Duma to consider this bill and the submitted documents with it and take an appropriate decision. On the basis of the analysis, it was concluded that the right of legislative initiative is implemented nonuniformly, because the state Duma enacts different laws on legal force. The question about from what moment the stage of the legislative initiative starts, at the same time, points of view are presented by both domestic and foreign authors. There is a conclusion made, that the real scope of authority subjects, that hold the right of legislative initiative in Russia is not the same, because it depends on the political and legal status of subjects of constitutional legal relations. The problem of the subject composition of persons who have the right of the legislative initiative, which is defined in Art. 104 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation is being discussed. The author comes to the conclusion, that there is an expansion in the subject composition of who have the right of legislative initiative in modern Russia, in which in addition to the General Prosecutor, the Ombudsman for Human and Citizen’s Rights, as well as the well-established large public organizations, should be added. It is noted, that the best form, in which the legal norms, that regulate the right of the legislative initiative will be fixed, is the Federal Law “On Regulatory Legal Acts in the Russian Federation”.
Overview of parliamentary politics in contemporary Russia.
The dg.o conference is the flagship conference of the Digital Government Society (DGS), and has positioned itself to be a top-ranking conference in this interdisciplinary academic field. It brings high quality research contributions and plays a major role in the advancement of knowledge in the field of digital government. The continue growing number of scholars and the growing number of members will continue to reinforce the position of DGS as a research and practice platform where researchers and practitioners can meet, exchange ideas, and build new relationships.
The purpose of this paper is to assess the size of public sector within the Russian banking industry. We identify and classify at least 78 state-influenced banks. We distinguish between banks that are majority-owned by federal executive authorities or Central Bank of Russia, by sub-federal (regional and municipal) authorities, by state-owned enterprises and banks, and by "state corporations". We estimate their combined market share to have reached 56% of total assets by July 1, 2009. Banks indirectly owned by public capital are the fastest-growing group. Concentration is increasing within the public sector of the industry, with the top five state-controlled banking groups in possession of over 49% of assets. We observe a crowding out and erosion of domestic private capital, whose market share is shrinking from year to year. Several of the largest state-owned banks now constitute a de facto intermediate tier at the core of the banking system. We argue that the direction of ownership change in Russian banking is different from that in CEE countries.
The purpose of this paper is to carefully assess the size of public sector within the Russian banking industry. We identify and classify at least 78 state-influenced banks. For the state-owned banks, we distinguish between those that are majority-owned by federal executive authorities or Central Bank of Russia, by sub-federal (regional and municipal) authorities, by state-owned enterprises and banks, and by "state corporations". We estimate their combined market share to have reached 56% of total assets by July 1, 2009. Banks indirectly owned by public capital are the fastest-growing group. Concentration is increasing within the public sector of the industry, with the top five state-controlled banking groups in possession of over 49% of assets. We observe a crowding out and erosion of domestic private capital, whose market share is shrinking from year to year. Several of the largest state-owned banks now constitute a de facto intermediate tier at the core of the banking system. We argue that the direction of ownership change in Russian banking is different from that in CEE countries.
Researchers of civil control are interested in public interest as legal category. Civil control is an observation, verification and appreciation in accordance with public interests by government. Civil control is exercised for the purpose defense and protection of the public interests.
The article examines trends in fundraising of small industrial enterprises in Russia. There is an analysis of existing financial instruments of state support of small industrial companies, advantages and disadvantages. Despite the fact that an active government policy the past few years has greatly improved the ability of small industrial companies to attract the necessary funding, an imbalance in the amount of financial support at various stages of company development was revealed.
This tutorial textbook is dedicated to normwriting as an independent science and consists of two parts. In the first (general) part are sanctified general theoretical problems of normmaking and norm-setting legal technique. The second part of (special) is devoted to technology standards-related activities and serves as a guide to the preparation of a variety of technologies of various types of normative legal acts. The textbook is designed for students of the course normografii, and may also be useful to deputies, state and municipal officials, researchers, teachers and anyone interested in the problems of standard-setting and legal monitoring.
This paper uses the banking industry case to show that the boundaries of public property in Russia are blurred. A messy state withdrawal in 1990s left publicly funded assets beyond direct reach of official state bodies. While we identify no less than 50 state-owned banks in a broad sense, the federal government and regional authorities directly control just 4 and 12 institutions, respectively. 31 banks are indirectly state-owned, and their combined share of state-owned banks’ total assets grew from 11% to over a quarter between 2001 and 2010. The state continues to bear financial responsibility for indirectly owned banks, while it does not benefit properly from their activity through dividends nor capitalization nor policy lending. Such banks tend to act as quasi private institutions with weak corporate governance. Influential insiders (top-managers, current and former civil servants) and cronies extract their rent from control over financial flows and occasional appropriation of parts of bank equity.
This paper analyzes a stylized model of an export-oriented economy. It investigates the impact of macroeconomic policies on the dynamics of the exchange rate, inflation, output and stabilization fund and consider different forms of strategic interaction between the government and the central bank. It is shown that the effective interaction of fiscal and monetary policies is possible under Stackelberg interaction with the government as leader and under cooperation.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/