?
Элементы критики Гуссерля
In his work "Critiquing Husserl: Elements", Eugen Fink reviews the main hurdles encountered by phenomenological research in philosophy. Among these hurdles he lists the interweaving between moments of description, analysis and speculation; the outer-philosophical presuppositions conficting with the claim of presuppositionlessness; the non-thought relation to the philosophical tradition; contradictions between the philosophical project and the practiced method; idols (or operative concepts) of phenomenological research, such as “immediate givenness,” “prepredicative experience,” “rigorous science,” “ultimate foundation.” Elements touched upon in this work include ffy-six aphorisms that are to serve as the foundation of a “Treatise on Phenomenological Research.” Tey mark a transition period in Fink’s thought (1939–1946). During this period he lef behind collaboration (intellectual “symbiosis”) with Husserl (1928–1938), within the framework of which many original Finkian themes were developed (for example, ideas about the “meontic” nature of subjectivity, a speculative and constructive supplement to Husserl’s project), and moved towards his own project of philosophical cosmology (1947–1975). Of special interest is the fact that in 1940, Fink, while trying to overcome the limitations of phenomenological philosophy, began to rely not on his own philosophical project (which is yet to develop), but mainly on Heidegger’s (and sometimes also Hegel’s) critiques of Husserl. In this work, Fink is still engaged in the phenomenological project, yet he tries to move beyond the ideas of this tradition’s founding father. Tis stance explains the unexpected harshness of some of Fink’s formulations, such as “is not worth a dime philosophically,” “boring descriptions,” “fagrant presupposition of the phenomenological description,” etc. In addition, we should remember that this text is compiled from Fink’s private notes rather than from his speeches or published treatises