(Не)применение исполнительского иммунитета в делах об обращении в доход государства коррупционно нажитого имущества

Российское право: образование, практика, наука. 2025. № 5. С. 53–63.

Романюк В. И.

The question of applicability of immunity from enforcement in cases of prosecutor filing an anti-corruption claim is related, on the one hand, to the very nature of such a claim as a means of minimizing the consequences of corrupt behavior, and, on the other, to the origin of the possessions seized in this case. Taking into account the public-law nature of this legal institution and the genesis of possessions subject to civil confiscation, the author argues in this article for the inapplicability of such an immunity (in particular, with respect to the sole residence) in these legal relationships. In doing so, the author draws comparative parallels with the corresponding legal institution of property immunity in criminal law and administrative-tort regulation. It is noted, however, that the legislator–given its broader discretion and with a view to a more comprehensive protection of individual rights – is free to regulate this issue differently, among other things, by drawing on international experience. The study’s objective is achieved through the use of legal scientific methods: formal logic, comparative legal analysis, methods of legal interpretation, and legal forecasting. Validity and reliability of the conclusions made are guaranteed by the use of current judicial practice, modern scientific doctrines and foreign legal regulations.

Keywords: property rights, право собственности, confiscation, конфискация, достоинство личности, исполнительский иммунитет, единственное жилое помещение, антикоррупционный иск, контроль за соответствием доходов и расходов, sole residence, executive immunity, personal dignity, anti-corruption lawsuit, control over compliance of income and expenses