Законно – установленная компенсация как мера имущественной ответственности при нарушении авторских прав в практике судов России и США
The key point of this article is comparative analysis of the Russian and USA national laws, the provision dealing with recovery statutory damages. The two basic aims of this form of liability are:
1) to give the courts specific unambiguous directions concerning monetary awards, thus avoiding the confusion and uncertainty and, at the same time,
2) to provide the courts with reasonable latitude to adjust recovery to the circumstances of the case, thus avoiding some of the artificial or overly technical difficulties.
The article also includes the review “fair use” as a special principle of liability.
The subject of this monograph is intellectual property law in Russia. This study focuses on legal mechanisms of protection of intellectual property rights since, in Russia, legislation is the main source of such rights. Though neither judicial practice nor theses propounded in legal literature are formally considered sources of intellectual property law in Russia, they at times seriously affect court rulings, and so much attention is paid to them in this study in dealing with key issues and points of dispute.
All references to legislation in this monograph are valid as of August 2014, but account is taken of amendments to Part Four of the Civil Code that are due to enter into force on 1 October 2014.
This paper is dedicated to the establishment of inclusive legal method in the system of intellectual property rights in terms of information economy.
A successful realization of the Russia and Belarus Union State’s project SKIF made a strong impulse to supercomputing in both countries. The scale of positive externalities to a large degree was made of the selected open model of intellectual property management. This made supercomputing available not only to the large corporations and state R&D bodies, but to the small and medium business as well. This resulted in the rise of innovation implementation and their contribution to modernization of Russian and Belarusian economies on the whole.
If considering traditions in law and in jurisprudence, one may assert that the most actual question in the contemporary Russia is the problem of precedent law. This problem is arisen in connection with some statements of the leading representatives of the judicial system about necessity to transform the Russian court process according to the model of the common law. One can investigate this problem through consideration of the new procedural institutes and their comparaive analysis.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/