?
Повестка дня и стратегии самоописания в дискурс-анализе
The paper observes the widely assumed historiographic typology of discourse analysis as a research framework in the 2nd part of the XX and the beginning of the XXI centuries. The author describes the key topical trends and referential structure of discourse-analytical publications, and the types of academic self-identification of the scholars in discourse analysis. The article discusses the pragmatics of autopoesis of discourse analysis and perspectives of cross-disciplinary cooperation of discourse-analysts. The special attention is upon the tendencies of discourse analysis’ topics and scholars’ identities drifting off the linguistic field. The author argues the discourse analysis to be a method, he regards one of discourse analysis versions as an engaged academic project and he claims that the real interaction between discourse analysis schools and approaches can only be possible on the topical and teleological, but not methodical basis.