Можно ли предоставить взыскателю право самому исполнить решение суда, если должник от исполнения уклоняется?

Вестник гражданского процесса. 2021. Т. 11. № 3. С. 316–334.

Оленин Д. А.

According to practice, it is often difficult for the claimant to get the execution of a court decision containing non-property requirements. At the same time, the legal mechanism of compulsory execution of non-property demands, which involves applying to the debtor various indirect enforcement measures in the hope of getting him to enforce a court decision, seems to be an inappropriate mechanism in terms of potential possibility of replacing the non-property demand with its cash equivalent. The paper analyses the application of the institution of changing the method and manner of a judicial act’s execution as a mechanism that provides the recoverer with the opportunity to fulfill the non-property requirements contained in the court decision by his own hands and for account of the defective debtor. The author notes the spread of two opposite positions on the issue in judicial practice and identifies the advantages and disadvantages of both of them.The author also expresses his opinion regarding the procedure for the implementation of the subjective civil right of the creditor to fulfill the obligation for account of the defective debtor, provided by the article 397 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, in enforcement proceedings and concludes that the institution of changing the method and manner of a judicial act’s execution is inadequate as a procedural mechanism for such implementation.

Keywords: гражданский процесс, исполнительное производство, способы защиты права, требования неимущественного характера, изменение способа и порядка исполнения судебного акта, ст. 397 ГК РФ