?
Экспериментальное исследование влияния фактора данности на выбор оформления сентенциального актанта в русском языке
С. 61–63.
Knyazev M., Рудалева Е. А.
abstract
Zevakhina N., Voprosy Jazykoznanija 2026 No. 3 P. 54–70
The paper demonstrates that the Russian particle mol exhibits a combination of properties associated
with direct, indirect, and free indirect discourse (FID). First, mol-clauses license shiftable linguistic
items (adverbial indexicals, expressive speech acts, imperatives, evaluative lexical items) not
only in FID, as typically assumed for such linguistic items, but also in indirect discourse. Second,
first- and second-person pronouns in ...
Added: September 29, 2026
Knyazev M., Folia Linguistica 2026 Vol. 60 No. 1 P. 453–496
Null complement anaphora, NCA (e.g., I suggested the price was too high, and she agreed ∅.), is a long known but poorly understood phenomenon subject to idiosyncratic lexical restrictions. In languages like Russian, however, it is (or
appears) productive, with verbs not allowing NCA hard to nd, raising the question whether omission of the clausal argument ...
Added: January 19, 2026
Kasenov D., Rudnev P., , in: Экспериментальные исследования языка: материалы конференции 2025.: М.: Наш мир, 2025. P. 50–53.
Added: January 19, 2026
Belova D., Русская речь 2024 № 4 С. 7–19
В данной работе представлено экспериментальное исследо- вание предикативного согласования по лицу и числу с двумя типами подлежащих — квантифицированных конструкций, содержащих лич- ное местоимение. Мы с помощью двух синтаксических экспериментов по оценке предложений от 1 до 7 сравнили свойства элективной (двое из нас) и номинативной (мы двое) конструкций относительно предпо- чтительной формы глагола в двух конфигурациях: при предглаголь- ном и заглагольном положении субъекта. В качестве квантификато- ров сравнивались порядковые числительные и кванторное слово все. Результаты показывают, что ...
Added: March 28, 2025
Letuchiy A., Вопросы языкознания 2023 № 3 С. 27–59
The article addresses Russian colloquial constructions with the complemtizer čto, such as "Ty skaži, čto ja že ne znal" ‘Say that you didn’t know it (lit. ‘that “I didn’t know that”’) or "On načal izvinjat’sja, čto on ne xotel" ‘He began to apologize that he didn’t mean that’. These constructions are mainly described in respect ...
Added: January 14, 2025
Chepovetskaia S., В кн.: Труды международной конференции «Корпусная лингвистика — 2023», 21–23 июня 2023 г., Санкт-Петербург.: СПб.: Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета, 2024.
The article is focused on the analysis of variability in the use of collocations “X sostoit/zaklyuchaetsya v P2” with the lexical function FUNC2 (the family of verbal lexical functions OPER-LABOR-FUNC) in scientific texts, comprising X as a lexical slot (the argument of the function) filled with a semantically appropriate nominative noun and P2 that indicates ...
Added: December 21, 2024
Mikhail Knyazev, Iana Ustinova, Russian linguistics 2023 Vol. 47 No. 1 P. 87–121
In Russian, argument clauses can be nominalized by the demonstrative pronoun to ‘that’ (henceforth, to čto-clauses). Although to čto-clauses have often been discussed in the literature, their distribution is still not fully understood and is subject to conflicting claims, partly owing to the fact that to čto in the accusative/nominative position coincides the “emerging” (noninflected) ...
Added: October 14, 2023
Rudnev P., Russian linguistics 2024 Vol. 48 No. 1 Article 1
Given the well-attested selectional asymmetries between clauses and nominals, selection-based empirical arguments for the projection of functional structure in the noun phrase are especially pertinent for the debate regarding the syntax of nominal phrases. One such argument is the selection of ‘small nominals’ by a Russian aspectual prefix. This paper reports naturally occurring and experimental ...
Added: October 14, 2023
Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2021.
This volume assembles contributions addressing clausal complementation across the entire South Slavic territory. The main focus is on particular aspects of complementation, covering the contemporary standard languages as well as older stages and/or non-standard varieties and the impact of language contact, primarily with non-Slavic languages. Presenting in-depth studies, they thus contribute to the overarching collective ...
Added: May 9, 2022
Letuchiy A., СПб.: Алетейя, 2021.
Монография посвящена русским конструкциям с сентенциальными актантами (придаточными,
которые занимают место актанта главного глагола). Автор уточняет существующие описания типов
подчинительных конструкций со "что" ("Я знаю, что он приехал"), инфинитивом ("Я забыл закрыть
дверь") и др. Однако главная задача книги – поставить новые вопросы и описать новые явления:
среди них – конструкции с дублированием в придаточном формы главного глагола ("Начать ...
Added: October 31, 2021
Knyazev M., Зарембо В. С., Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Язык и литература 2021 Т. 17 № 4 С. 650–671
e spread of the complementation construction o tom, čto in non-standard Russian in recent decades has been attested in previous work. It has been established that the construction has a wide distribution and can replace not only ordinary complement clauses introduced by the complementizer čto (so-called čto-clauses), cf. podtverždat’ o tom, čto + p ‘con ...
Added: October 28, 2021
Knyazev M., , in: Advances in formal Slavic linguistics 2018.: Language Science Press, 2021. P. 189–225.
I discuss two ‘need’ + NP constructions in Russian, namely (i) the more basic con- struction with a nominative theme and (ii) the underdescribed, highly colloquial construction with an accusative theme. Building on work on the semantics of pos- sessive constructions, I show that the two constructions di er as to which seman- tic relations ...
Added: October 28, 2021
Maisak T., В кн.: Дурхъаси хазна. Сборник статей к 60-летию Р. О. Муталова.: М.: Буки Веди, 2021. С. 220–257.
В статье обсуждается типологическое варьирование, наблюдаемое при выражении значения ‘сделать вид, что’ в языках нахско-дагестанской семьи, на материале переводов одного контекста в Евангелии от Луки (Иисус сделал вид, что хочет идти дальше, Лк. 24:28). ...
Added: May 25, 2021
Kholodilova M., Вопросы языкознания 2020 № 3 С. 135–146
В рецензии рассматривается коллективная монография, посвященная обобщенным приименным клаузальным конструкциям. ...
Added: September 20, 2020
Panova A., Вопросы языкознания 2020 № 4 С. 87–114
The present paper deals with morphologically bound complementation, a type of constructions where a matrix predicate and the head of its sentential complement constitute a single verb morphologically but retain their syntactic and semantic independence. This type of polypredication is discussed on the material of Abaza (< Northwest Caucasian): I consider a construction with an element ...
Added: July 8, 2020
Letuchiy A., / NRU HSE. Series WP BRP "Linguistics". 2019. No. WP BRP 88/LNG/2019.
The article focuses on cases when the length of the constituent is relevant for Russian syntax and leads to ungrammaticality or partial acceptability of some structures. The list of phenomena under consideration includes ‘one-word restrictions’; differences between complement clauses of matrix verbs in indicative vs. imperative, include constructions with ‘predicatives’, special properties of nominalizations, structures ...
Added: December 16, 2019
Schnittke E., Вопросы языкознания 2020 № 3 С. 26–51
The study examines tense variation in complement and subject clauses subordinate to and co-temporal with matrix past tense verbs in Russian. The semantics of the matrix verb is commonly named as one of the major factors that govern tense choice in complement and subject clauses: verbs of speech are said to exclusively license present tense ...
Added: October 23, 2019