Европейский разворот в регулировании признания и приведения в исполнение решений иностранных судов и иностранных арбитражных решений в Российской Федерации

Научные записки молодых исследователей. 2018. № 5. С. 50–58.

Яцук Н. П.

The subject of this article is a comparative analysis of the legal regulation of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements and arbitral awards in countries of Western Europe and Russia. The goal is to identify current trends in reforming institutions and court’s decision-making, to define the limits of the international principles of “courtesy” and “reciprocity” in the balance of public and private interests as well as to embody European procedural standards for harmonizing domestic legislation. Research rationale is inferred due to the increasing role of international regulations and soft norms in the area of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements and arbitral awards. The empirical field includes approaches to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments of four countries: Russia, Germany, France and the United Kingdom. In conclusion, we made proposals regarding the reform of domestic legislation based on prescriptions. The field of approbation of the results is the Committee of the State Duma on civil, criminal, arbitration and procedural legislation, courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: публичный порядок, принцип взаимности, public order, принцип международной вежливости, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, comity of nations, principle of reciprocity, principle of "natural justice", conventional model, declarative model, doctrine of "forum non conveniens", признание и исполнение решения иностранного суда, концепция "естественной справедливости", конвенциальная модель регулирования, модель универсализма, доктрина forum non conveniens