?
Foundations of Logical Consequence
Oxford :
Oxford University Press, 2015.
Under the general editorship: C. Caret, O. Hjortland
Foundations of Logical Consequence
Chapters
Zardini E., , in: Foundations of Logical Consequence.: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. P. 221–275.
I start with some rather dogmatic statements, simply in order to x a speci c enough
framework against which to investigate the topic of this paper. The reader who does not
share some or all of the doctrines thereby expressed is invited to modify the rest of the
discussion in this paper in accordance to her favourite views on ...
Added: October 27, 2018
Language:
English
Keywords: logical consequence
Moiseeva A., Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология 2024 № 81 С. 39–47
The article defends the following theses: 1. The interpretation of relevant implication as a formalization of the natural concept of entailment leads to the fact that the logical properties attributed to the implication in a specific version of relevant logic are transferred to the level of semantics and determine the properties of the model. 2. ...
Added: November 28, 2024
Dragalina-Chernaya E., Эпистемология и философия науки 2020 Т. 57 № 2 С. 79–95
Согласно классическому определению Альфреда Тарского, логическое следование необходимо и формально. В статье обсуждаются те смыслы, в которых материальное следование может быть признано логическим отношением. Различение формального и материального следования, проведенное Тарским, сопоставляется с пониманием следования в современной теорией моделей, а также с дихотомиями формальных и материальных консеквенций в логике Жана Буридана, формального и материального обоснования ...
Added: March 11, 2020
Zardini E., Journal of Philosophical Logic 2019 Vol. 48 No. 1 P. 155–188
In other works, I’ve proposed a solution to the semantic paradoxes which, at the technical level, basically relies on failure of contraction. I’ve also suggested that, at the philosophical level, contraction fails because of the instability of certain states of affairs. In this paper, I try to make good on that suggestion. ...
Added: March 19, 2019
Zardini E., , in: Foundations of Logical Consequence.: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. P. 221–275.
I start with some rather dogmatic statements, simply in order to x a speci c enough
framework against which to investigate the topic of this paper. The reader who does not
share some or all of the doctrines thereby expressed is invited to modify the rest of the
discussion in this paper in accordance to her favourite views on ...
Added: October 27, 2018
Schang F., Studia Humana 2013 Vol. 2 No. 3 P. 31–45
It is claimed hereby that, against a current view of logic as a theory of consequence, opposition is a basic logical concept that can be used to define consequence itself. This requires some substantial changes in the underlying framework, including: a non-Fregean semantics of questions and answers, instead of the usual truth-conditional semantics; an extension ...
Added: October 30, 2014