?
"Амосис, он же Тетмосис" фараон – изгонитель гиксосов у Манефона
The author demonstrates that the duplicating transfer of the names of Misfragmuthosis and Thutmosis (= Thutmose III and Thutmose IV) to the kings of the time of expulsion of the Hyksos (Misfragmuthosis I occurs thus to be the last king of the 17th Manetho dynasty) as given by Josephus is not caused by mechanical compilation or corruption of the text but by the existence of a contaminating Egyptian tradition that perceived the enemies of Thutmose III in Syria (in fact Mitannians and their allies) as the same Hyksos, and as the result presented capture of Megiddo by Thutmose III Menkheperre and subsequent wars of Thutmose IV as decisive victory over the Hyksos, ending with mixing capture of Megiddo and taking of Avaris. Comparing this tradition with another (in fact more reliable), according to which the founder of the XVIII dynasty of Ahmose I and his predecessor finished with the Hyksos, and not knowing that these traditions are in fact incompatible, Manetho or his source concluded that the kings-winners of the Hyksos wore names ascribed to them by the first tradition and thus occured to be simply the namesakes of the later real Thutmoses III and IV, so that the founder of the XVIII dynasty, Ahmose was also called Thutmose, and his predecessor was called Thutmose-Menkheperre.