Социальный либерализм: анализ с позиции австрийской школы

С. 285–305.

Zaostrovtsev A. P.

The article contains the critical examination of Grinberg-Rubinfeld’s concept of economic sociodynamics (CES) and patronized goods from the position of liberal doctrines of the Austrian school. It reveals von Mises theory of history, where ideas occupy the central place and interests are pro-derivatives from them. It is shown that the notion of "public interest" is a dominant public opinion, which, of course, cannot exist as something separate from the individuals. Thus the holism inherent in CES is rejected. Public interest is not necessary represents something positive and ensuring progress. The public interest may be aimed against it. And outside public opinion it simply does not exist. Patronized goods with the exception of pure public goods become so not because they have need in the state, but because the state and interest groups need to take care of them. The state constrains free entrepreneurship, which only could provide efficient delivery of the most of the patronized goods. And the state is ineffective supplier of these goods. In general social liberalism from the perspective of the Austrian economic theory is presented as a new wave of statism

Keywords: public opinion, public interest, общественный интерес, теория истории, theory of history, идеи, опекаемые блага, economic sociodynamics, patronized goods, ideas, statism, экономическая социодинамика,, общественное мнение, этатизм

In book

Социальный либерализм

СПб.: Алетейя, 2016.