?
The ontology of logical form: formal ontology vs. formal deontology
P. 89–90.
The main aim of this paper is to show the advantages of shifting focus from substantial towards dynamic model of formality, i.e. from formal ontology (the domain of higher order formal objects, e.g. hypostases of structurally invariant properties of models) to formal deontology (the domain of rules-governed and goals-directed activity).
Publication based on the results of:
In book
Istanbul: Istanbul University, 2015.
Zolotkov G., Жулитова А. Ю., Артикульт 2017 Т. 26 № 2 С. 122–127
На основе идей Л.Витгенштейна авторы статьи рассматривают аргументацию против представления об эстетике как о теоретическом исследовании. Согласно критикуемому представлению сфера эстетики может иметь четкую артикуляцию также как естественные науки, а в отношении произведений искусства могут быть уместны споры о более точном их анализе. В работах Витгенштейна этому представлению противостоит понимание эстетики как сферы, имеющей особый ...
Added: September 25, 2023
Smirnov M., Эпистемология и философия науки 2016 Т. 50 № 4 С. 135–150
The investigation is devoted to the problem of formal representaon of logical structure and ontological commitments of natural language event sentences. The speci city of ontological commitments problem with regard to natural and formal languages is shown. The alternative approaches to the formal representa on of event sentences (argument approach, davidsonian and neodavidsonian approaches, operator ...
Added: December 15, 2016
Dragalina-Chernaya E., Logical Investigations 2016 Vol. 22 No. 2 P. 59–72
The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the origin and the bounds of the schematic hylomorphism in ancient and medieval logic. The sub-purposes are four-fold. Firstly, various explications of the logical hylomorphism will be illustrated. Secondly, I propose to reevaluate certain interpretations of Aristotle’s syllogistic. I attempt to answer the question why Aristotle ...
Added: November 2, 2016
Dragalina-Chernaya E., Преподаватель XXI век 2015 № 3 С. 232–242
The aim of this paper is to discuss the dichotomy of formal and informal styles of reasoning in the perspective of practical turn in logic. The heuristic potential of the concept "image of logic" introduced by I.N. Griftsova for the critics of essentialist theories of formality will be revealed ...
Added: October 21, 2015
Dragalina-Chernaya E., Кантовский сборник 2015 Т. 52 № 2 С. 86–96
Предлагается дихотомия субстанциальной и динамической моделей формальности. Показывается, что отсутствие в аристотелевской силлогистике строгого различения между синтаксисом и семантикой, а также редуктивный подход к типологии выводов (силлогическим модусам трех фигур) смещают фокус интереса с субстанциальной на динамическую модель формальности. Формальность кантовской общей логики также получает динамическую интерпретацию, В то время как общая логика касается лишь ...
Added: April 15, 2015
Dragalina-Chernaya E., СПб.: Алетейя, 2015.
В монографии прослеживается эволюция философских представлений о логической форме от античности до наших дней. На основе дихотомии субстанциальной и динамической моделей формальности систематизируются различные версии логического гилеморфизма. Книга предназначена для специалистов в области логики и философии языка, а также для всех, кто интересуется историей и современным состоянием философской логики и формальной философии. ...
Added: April 14, 2015
Dragalina-Chernaya E., / Series HUM "Humanities". 2015. No. WP BRP 88/HUM/2015.
The purpose of this paper is four-fold. Firstly, various explications of the logical hylomorphism will be sketched. Secondly, I propose to revisit certain interpretations of Aristotle’s syllogistic. I attempt to answer the question why Aristotle was not the founder of logical hylomorphism. Thirdly, I try to qualify the logical hylomorphism of Alexander of Aphrodisias. Finally, ...
Added: February 25, 2015
Dragalina-Chernaya E., , in: Handbook of the World Congress and School on Universal Logic III April 18 - 25 Lisbon - Portugal Edited by Jean-Yves B ́eziau, Carlos Caleiro, Jo ̃ao Rasga e Alexandre Costa-Leite.: Lisbon: [б.и.], 2010. P. 103–104.
Some principles of demarcation of the bounds of logic as formal ontology are discussed. Although Tarski’s philosophical generalization of his permutation invariance criterion - our logic is logic of cardinality - appeared to be justified by the theory of monadic quantification (logic of properties of classes of individuals), it is not correct for the theory ...
Added: September 13, 2013
Lisbon: [б.и.], 2010.
In the same way that universal algebra is a general theory of algebraic structures, universal logic is a general theory of logical structures. During the 20th century, numerous logics have been created: intuitionistic logic, deontic logic, many- valued logic, relevant logic, linear logic, non monotonic logic, etc. Universal logic is not a new logic, it ...
Added: September 13, 2013
Dragalina-Chernaya E., From the ALWS archives: A selection of papers from the International Wittgenstein Symposia in Kirchberg am Wechsel 2013
My purpose in this paper is to interpret model-theoretic languages (abstract logics) as formal ontologies both in phenomenological and ontological engineering senses. The main idea of my approach is the interpretation of the classes of isomorphism as model-theoretic analogues of categorical objects of Husserl’s formal region. Some principles of demarcation of the bounds of logic ...
Added: June 23, 2013