?
Форсайт в государственном управлении научно-технологическим развитием в условиях глубокой неопределенности
In conditions of deep uncertainty with weak signals and wildcard events, it is becoming increasingly challenging to establish priorities for science and technology development. This context creates new demands on public administration and the governance of science, such as adherence to the principles of cooperation, receptivity to change, flexibility and scientific validity. These criteria correspond to the network configuration of interaction, uniting parties interested in cooperation and finding solutions to development challenges. In this context, Science and Technology Foresight is used as a tool to analyze complex phenomena, considering nonlinear development and determining scientific and technological priorities within the context of shrinking planning horizons and identifying challenges and opportunities.
This article considers the characteristics of effective public governance in dynamically changing conditions, the factors that make S&T Foresight a suitable tool for a proactive approach to decision-making and implementation that takes into account development turbulence, and the strengths and weaknesses of using S&T Foresight in public governance. It also touches upon the problem of the isolation of foresight studies results from governance practice. These results could form the basis of a more in-depth analysis of the specific factors influencing the integration of S&T Foresight into public governance, leading to the development of appropriate recommendations.