?
Тематическая разметка антропологического корпуса: методика классификации шахтерских нарративов
The article describes the methodology for creating an anthropological corpus of texts that are united by
belonging to the mining profession. The content of the work correlates with three research tasks: development of a
thematic classification, introduction of conventions for highlighting narratives in the text, 3) determination of principles
for organizing the corpus according to the themes of narratives. Thematic classification of narratives was the result of
the analysis of several «control» texts. It represents a multi-level systematization of topics of cultural and professional
nature: when the main (basic) topics can have internal detail, which leads to the emergence of micro-topics. The number of such microtopics can be different and is determined by the specifics of the topic itself, i.e. the ability to characterize the corresponding phenomenon of reality in various aspects. Fragments of text in which a particular topic or subtopic is implemented are highlighted with square brackets. On both sides of the brackets, the numerical designations of the corresponding topic/subtopic from the previously given thematic classification are indicated. During thematic marking, the principles of compliance of the narrative with the main theme of the corpus, incompleteness of the thematic classification, integrity of the narrative, non-rigid marking, taking into account «zero» topics are maintained. The article describes particular problems of marking, when a particular topic is not developed by the informant, despite the fact that the context allows for different interpretations of the topic of the narrative. In such situations, during the marking process, the topic purposefully represented by the informant is separated from facts that may have only an indirect relation to any topic, but may not have any. Thus, the described methodology represents the first approach to developing a meta-markup standard. The type of marking used can be called extra-linguistic based on the specifics of the subject information, analytical based on the method of identification, narrative based on the object, multi-level based on the depth of classification, manual based on the method of assigning labels, and neutral in relation to a certain theory.