Book chapter
Разработка метода комплексирования физической модели с моделями протекающих электрических, тепловых и механических процессов
С. 433-435.
In book
Edited by: И. Иванов, Л. Агеева, Д. Дубоделова и др. М.: МИЭМ, 2012.
Similar publications
Трофимова Н. А., Ереметова К. Ю. Когнитивные исследования языка. 2015. № 21. С. 272-277.
This article considers the model of metaphorical transfer of names of natural (atmospheric) phenomena. The worn inner form of many metaphors needs to consult the diachronic aspect, which allowes us to determine the conceptual transfer vector - the emotional attitude of speakers to natural phenomena, deterministic fear of them, faith in their supernatural origin.
Added: Sep 5, 2015
Кирюшин С. А. В кн.: Пути развития общества в эпоху перемен: Материалы II-ой региональной научной конференции. Н. Новгород: НКИ, 2001. С. 197-199.
Added: Jul 6, 2012
Кирюшин С. А. Н. Новгород: Центр Оперативной Печати, 2011.
Added: Jul 10, 2012
Виноградов А. Н., Духовенский Г. Е. В кн.: Функциональные наноматериалы для космической техники. Труды 2-й Всероссийской школы-семинара студентов, аспирантов и молодых ученых. М.: МИЭМ, 2011. С. 244-252.
Added: Apr 18, 2012
Starovoytenko E. B., Derbeneva A. Psychology. PSY. Высшая школа экономики, 2016. No. WP BRP 69/PSY/2016 .
This paper develops a new approach to study one’s relationships with others, focusing on the conditions and the effects of the dialogical nature of a person. Theoretical modelling, hermeneutics, qualitative and quantitative methods are applied. A solution for detecting the conditions of self-development and social positioning of a person, which are rooted in dialogical I-Other relationships, is suggested. The originality of the paper is found in describing the relation to the other as the I-Other relationship; in the elaborated model that highlights how different dimensions of I-Other relationships (between I and Other, I-in-Other, Other-in-I, I-in-Myself) leads to truly a dialogical mode of being; in revealing the potentials of the Conversation Partner in dialogical I-Other relationships (subjective interrelations and the significance of Conversation Partners, their activity, the fullness of the reflection of significant Conversation Partners); in the description of different “hypostases” of Conversation Partners (real, ideal, imagined, secret, I as Myself) by means of hermeneutics; in the “My Conversation Partner” method; and in the empirical study of existential and social resources of Conversation Partners. The theoretical background of the study is formed by the works of M. Bakhtin, M. Buber, M. Heidegger, J.-P. Sartre, E. Levinas, and by the works of modern psychologists such as G. M. Kuchinsky, A. V. Rossohin, E. B. Starovoytenko, C. T. Brown, P.W.Keller, H. Hermans, F. Rivetti Ваrbo. The results show the potentials of social adaptivity, affiliation, dominating, positive solitude, joy of solitude, freedom, self-transcendence, existential fulfilment are associated with the richness of one's Conversation Partners. A real Conversation Partner is associated with a greater affiliation resource, a secret one with a greater solitude resource, an ideal one with a higher potential to constructively dominate the interaction.
Added: Dec 24, 2016
Виноградов А. Н., Вотинов Ю. Ю., Матвеев Е. В. В кн.: Концентрированные потоки энергии в индустрии наносистем, материалов и живых систем. Труды 2 Всероссийской научной школы для молодежи. М.: Московский государственный институт электроники и математики, 2009. С. 109-119.
Added: Apr 18, 2012
Added: Nov 14, 2012
Баграмянц Н. Л. Акмеология. 2011. № 3. С. 51-54.
Added: Oct 18, 2012
Таланов В. А. Н. Новгород: Издательство Нижегородского госуниверситета, 1994.
Added: Dec 24, 2012
Киселева С. В. Вестник Ленинградского государственного университета им. А.С. Пушкина. 2011. Т. 7. № 4. С. 28-44.
Added: Feb 5, 2012