Book chapter
Право собственности в Пятикнижии: философско-нравственные ориентиры
С. 269-288.
Similar publications
Сокова З. К. В кн.: Гражданское право. М.: Издательский дом «Форум», 2011. Гл. 12. С. 129-135.
Added: Jan 21, 2013
Гулевич О. А. В кн.: Психологические исследования духовно-нравственных проблем. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2011. С. 87-109.
Added: Oct 1, 2012
Бочкарев С. А., Жалинский А. Э. Имущественные отношения в Российской Федерации. 2010. № 9. С. 10-19.
In this paper a study of criminal law mechanism for the protection of property with aim of establishing its relationship with inflation and deflation processes, aggravated in the Russian economy in the current financial crisis. As a result, the author found that the application of the criminal law does not solve the problem of stratification of modern society, but aggravates it.
Added: Oct 25, 2012
Сушенцова М. С., Мирошниченко М. А., Лымарь Ф. А. Экономические реформы конца XX века: опыт и уроки новейшей истории. WP11. Высшая школа экономики, 2020. № WP11/2020/01.
Added: Oct 8, 2020
Позднякова Е. А. В кн.: Диалектика современных инновационных механизмов по разрешению правовых конфликтов: материалы международной научно-практической конференции. Оренбург: Оренбургский государственный аграрный университет, 2011. С. 171-177.
Added: Apr 16, 2012
Апресян Р. М.: Альфа-М, 2009.
Added: Oct 27, 2012
Боголюбов С. А. Журнал российского права. 2013. № 10(202). С. 5-13.
Added: Feb 25, 2014
Kumankov A. Философия и исследования культуры. WP20. Высшая школа экономики, 2016
Brian Orend, one of the leading just war theorists, is best known today for elaborating jus post bellum principles while his works contain another distinctive component, concept of “minimally just” political community. This article explores Briand Orend’s conception of “minimally just” political community, especially the meaning of this concept for Orend’s version of just war theory. Orend uses Kantian political and moral philosophy in order to prove there are two key functions of state: protection of human rights and establishing order. Since human rights are universal, a state should assist in protection of human rights of every person, not only its citizen’s rights. This leads to situation when states avoid of harming foreigners and aggressive wars become banned. Orend call a state “minimally just” if it follows these rules. However, these states could violate non-intervention principle and start wars. A crucial point here is an idea that a “minimally just” state has a right to fight for the overthrow of the aggressive regimes and establishment of “minimal justice”. The author concludes that this notion helps Orend extend the list of just causes of war, though his original intention was limitation of cases when arms could be used.
Added: Oct 16, 2015
Edited by: Р. Апресян М.: Альфа-М, 2009.
Added: Oct 27, 2012