Book chapter
Правовая охрана интеллектуальной собственности в Южно-Африканской Республике
С. 161-169.
Ирина Александровна Макарова
In book
Edited by: Т. А. Алексеева, А. Ильин СПб.: Издательство Политехнического университета, 2012.
Similar publications
Лушина Л. А. В кн.: Преступления против интеллектуальной собственности: материалы Международной научно-практической конференции (Нижний Новгород, 19–20 мая 2011 года). Н. Новгород: Стимул-СТ, 2011. С. 269-280.
Added: Mar 1, 2013
Сухарева А. Е. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2017.
Added: Mar 2, 2018
Титова Е. В. Экономические науки. 2010. № 12 (73). С. 90-94.
Added: Apr 13, 2012
Козичева Е. В. Маркетинг в России и за рубежом. 2012. № 3. С. 40-46.
Added: Jul 9, 2012
Kalyatin V. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 01.
The sui generis database right was added to copyright protection of databases in the Russian legislation only in 2008. In December 2010, new draft amendments to the RF Civil Code were published, substantially developing this regulation. This article examines the position of the Russian Federation regarding regulation of databases in its historical development and compares it with the relevant regulation in the European Union. While the Russian Federation generally follows the European model, there are some important specific provisions in the Russian Federation that should be taken into account by database producers and database users.
Added: Aug 27, 2012
Баширов М. А. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2013. No. WP BRP 29/LAW/2013.
Сloud computing is treated by most of the experts as one of the main trends of information technologies development for forthcoming years. In present article we focus on general overview of the main aspects of cloud computing services legal regime in Russia. Such aspects include, inter alia, intellectual property and contract law matters, taxation issues, execution of the agreements, warranties and representations under cloud computing agreements and personal data regulations.
Added: Jan 24, 2014
Edited by: И. В. Коробко Вып. 1(87). М.: Отделение подготовки и выпуска официальной информации Федерального государственного бюджетного учреждения «Федеральный институт промышленной собственности» (ФИПС), 2014.
Added: Apr 1, 2014
Kashanin A. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2014. No. WP BRP 32/LAW/2014.
In codifying intellectual property rights, Russian legislators have left what standards of originality and creativity can be considered criteria of copyrightability a moot point. Nevertheless, it is crucial for answering questions about where the lower boundary of copyrightability lies and, consequently, what intellectual products that have an insignificant creative component, but are of high economic importance – such as databases, computer software, advertisement slogans or design work – should be copyrightable. This article addresses the problem of identifying criteria for copyrightability and non-copyrightability in the Russian legal literature by modeling various types of demarcation criteria and analyzing their strong and weak points. Analyzing debates in the legal literature warrant the conclusion that there is a trend to set looser standards for originality and creativity and grant copyright protection to works of low authorship.
Added: Feb 14, 2014
Будник Р. А. Хозяйство и право. 2012. № 3. С. 70-78.
This paper is dedicated to the establishment of inclusive legal method in the system of intellectual property rights in terms of information economy.
Added: Aug 27, 2013
Марширов В. В., Марширова Л. Е. В кн.: Власть, бизнес, бизнес-образование: интеграция на пути модернизации. Материалы II Международной научно-практической конференции (7 апреля 2011 г., г. Ульяновск, УлГТУ). Ульяновск: УлГТУ, 2011. С. 214-217.
Added: Jul 3, 2012
Панченко П. Н. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2008.
Added: Oct 24, 2012