Book chapter
Проблема справедливости в философии и праве
С. 102-106.
Бикметова Т. И., Родичева О. С., Якупова Г. Х.
In book
Edited by: Е. А. Гриднева Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2009.
Similar publications
Гаспарян О. Т. Политическая теория и политический анализ. WP14. Высшая школа экономики, 2013
Added: Oct 1, 2013
Лошкарева М. Е. В кн.: Кодификация законодательства: теория, практика, техника: Материалы Международной научно-практической конференции (Нижний Новгород, 25–26 сентября 2008 года). Н. Новгород: Нижегородская академия МВД России, 2009. С. 565-577.
Added: May 24, 2012
Нагорная И. И. Право и политика. 2012. № 5. С. 887-896.
Added: Aug 3, 2012
Александровский С. В. В кн.: Перспективы развития инновационной экономики России в XXI веке: материалы международной научно-практической конференции. Н. Новгород: ООО "Стимул-СТ", 2010. С. 7-15.
Added: Jun 29, 2012
Гриднева Е. А. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2010.
Added: Jul 10, 2012
Гриднева Е. А., Капранова К. О. В кн.: Коммуникативистика ХХI века: перспективы развития социально-гуманитарного знания: материалы VI Всероссийской научно-практической конференции, 19 марта 2010 г.. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2010. С. 87-93.
Added: Jul 6, 2012
Кравчук Н. В., Воронова Е., Алексеева Т. Н. и др. М.: Институт семьи и воспитания РАО, 2010.
Added: Sep 12, 2012
Капелюшников Р. И. Проблемы рынка труда. WP3. Высшая школа экономики, 2008. № 03.
The paper examines a problem of legitimization of the privatization’s outcomes in Russia and provides a critical appraisal of various political proposals for its resolution. The analysis proceeds from a distinction between two different types of ownership illegitimacy — “specified” and “attenuated” ones. The paper argues that the “unspecified” illegitimacy evolved in Russia is not an absolute obstacle for sustainable economic growth but rather an institutional “birth trauma” which is common for all post-socialist countries and which could be cured only by piecemeal approaching of relationship between “strong” and “week” economic actors to principles of fair play.
Added: Mar 31, 2013
Kumankov A. Философия и исследования культуры. WP20. Высшая школа экономики, 2016
Brian Orend, one of the leading just war theorists, is best known today for elaborating jus post bellum principles while his works contain another distinctive component, concept of “minimally just” political community. This article explores Briand Orend’s conception of “minimally just” political community, especially the meaning of this concept for Orend’s version of just war theory. Orend uses Kantian political and moral philosophy in order to prove there are two key functions of state: protection of human rights and establishing order. Since human rights are universal, a state should assist in protection of human rights of every person, not only its citizen’s rights. This leads to situation when states avoid of harming foreigners and aggressive wars become banned. Orend call a state “minimally just” if it follows these rules. However, these states could violate non-intervention principle and start wars. A crucial point here is an idea that a “minimally just” state has a right to fight for the overthrow of the aggressive regimes and establishment of “minimal justice”. The author concludes that this notion helps Orend extend the list of just causes of war, though his original intention was limitation of cases when arms could be used.
Added: Oct 16, 2015
Залпов Н. В. Право и политика. 2012. № 6. С. 1086-1092.
Added: Jul 27, 2012