Book chapter
Экономический дискурс как объект междисциплинарных исследований (обзор научных концепций)
С. 132-136.
Кадимова Р. Н.
In book
М.: Издательство МГОУ, 2012.
Similar publications
Кадимова Р. Н. В кн.: Французский язык: теория и практика. Выпуск 2. Вып. 2. М.: Спутник+, 2012. С. 22-29.
Added: Oct 6, 2012
Маркова Ю. В. Социологические исследования. 2007. № 1. С. 42-47.
Added: Aug 3, 2012
Svetlana Yu. Toldova, Mira B. Bergelson, Elizaveta I. Ivtushok et al. Linguistics. WP BRP. НИУ ВШЭ, 2016. No. 50.
This work is devoted to the distribution of different referential devices in spoken discourse produced by healthy speakers and people with aphasia and its comparison to written discourse. We discuss some special annotation issues for the corpus of Pear film retellings (Russian CliPS) by people with aphasia (PWA), right hemisphere damage (RHD), and healthy speakers (HP for healthy people) of Russian. The study summarizes the comprehensive annotation schema developed for this task and the preliminary research of the referential choice features based on the corpus. Comparing retellings and written texts, we found a significant difference in the use of basic coreferential expressions between the two. Firstly, there is a significant difference in the distribution of basic NP types. Speakers use reduced devices such as zero anaphora or bare nouns in retellings more frequently than in written texts. There are also differences in the distribution of more granulated features such as the word order within an NP, the use of anaphoric and reduced expressions (demonstratives or zero NPs) for the first mention of an entity, and the inclusion of epistemic markers into NPs. We also found that the retellings produced by PWA and HP do not differ much in terms of the distribution of basic NP types. However, a detailed analysis of different NP types and taking into consideration various disfluencies reveals some prominent differences between the two populations. These include a difference in zero subject distribution, the frequency of non-referential NP links, the frequency of co-reference errors. While adapting the initial coreference annotation scheme we concluded that besides referential ambiguity, which is normally taken into account in spoken discourse analysis, and basic taxonomy of the referential devices (full NP vs. anaphoric pronoun vs. anaphoric zero), other features need to be considered
Added: Dec 13, 2016
Edited by: Т. Ю. Тамерьян Вып. 9. Владикавказ: Северо-Осетинский государственный университет им. К.Л. Хетагурова, 2007.
Added: Jul 9, 2012
Романова Т. В. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский государственный лингвистический университет им. Н.А. Добролюбова, 2011.
Added: Aug 24, 2012
Пермякова Т. М. В кн.: Мультикультурный мир: проблема понимания. Материалы Республиканской научно-практической международной конференции. Сыктывкар: Сыктывкарский государственный университет, 2012. С. 29-36.
The artcile presents nominations for interpersonal status of communicators in different types of intercultural discourse. These depend on the level of professional competence and range along the scale "naive - specific".
Added: Oct 17, 2012
Edited by: Н. Земон Дэвис, А. Фарж Т. 3. СПб.: Алетейя, 2008.
Added: Sep 14, 2012
Голечкова Т. Ю. Вестник московского государственного лингвистического университета. Серия: Педагогические науки. 2012. № 20 (653). С. 51-58.
In this article we present the results of research into discourse features characterising a lexico-semantic group of synonyms denoting a human being: human being, person, individual, personality and man. The main tool for analysis was language corpora, which made it possible not only to determine more precisely the functional styles the lexemes tend to be used in, but also to describe thematic characteristics of the texts in which the analysed lexical units show the highest frequency of use
Added: Feb 21, 2013