David Humes heritage is considered as philosophy of culture, corresponding to the time of its writing, which marked the beginning of a turn from classical model of culture to nonclassical one. Todays nonclassical philosophy of culture addresses itself to Humes ideas of illusiveness of a Self, to his moral philosophy, philosophy of religion, and to his critic of methodological use of a concept of causality, viewing them as its background.
This paper examines the practice of using the intuitivity test as an evaluation criterion of normative ethical theories. Mechanism of intuitive thinking and its differences from rational decision-making is described. It is shown, that due to the nature of intuitive thinking, the results of intuitivity test are often influenced by factors that contradict the conditions of the original problem, which calls into question the reliability of the results of such verification.