Book chapter
Метафизика диалога
С. 44-58.
Similar publications
Гусейнов Г. Ч. В кн.: Concilium Eirene XVI. Proceedings of the 16th International Eirene Conference, Prague 31.8.-4.9.1982. Т. XVI. Вып. 1-3. Прага: Kabinet pro studia řecká, římská a latinská ČSAV, 1983. С. 251-253.
Added: Aug 1, 2013
Yudin G. Humanities. HUM. Basic Research Programme, 2015. No. WP BRP 93/HUM/2015.
Alfred Schütz has paid considerable attention to the position of scientist in the world and particularly to that of social scientist. His analyses make extensive use of phenomenological concepts and contain detailed descriptions of scientific cognitive style in its relation to the everyday life. However, Schütz is surprisingly silent on the motives that could justify quitting the ordinary 'world of working' and entering the scientific attitude. This paper discusses whether the Schütz normative justification for science can be deduced from Husserl's philosophy of science. It is argued that despite the fact that Schütz was in fact considerably influenced by Husserl's system of science suggested in 'Ideas II', the two thinkers diverge radically on the cultural mission and methodology of science. While Husserl advocates the critical method of reduction as the sole way to pursue genuine science, Schütz in fact explores the possibility of building a 'naive science'. He accepts relying on ordinary knowledge in social science and ends up by rejecting the methodology of reduction in general. Schütz's opposition to the idea of science contained in Husserl's phenomenology, together with his neglect of normative grounding of science, suggest that he considered the value of science as laying beyond rational philosophical justification
Added: Apr 2, 2015
Shumilin M. Humanities. HUM. Basic Research Programme, 2012. No. 07.
Renaissance scholarly debates often look like personal invectives devoid of any real scientific content. The present paper examines this impression, considers several particular cases (Raffaele Reggio’s invectives against Johannes Calphurnius, Francesco Robortello’s polemics against Marc-Antoine Muret and Carlo Sigonio, Angelo Poliziano’s criticism of Domizio Calderini’s work) and proposes a more specified view on the problem.
Added: Dec 14, 2012
Edited by: Н. Розанова Вып. 5: Проблемы речевого общения. М.: Институт русского языка им. В.В. Виноградова, 2012.
Added: Nov 19, 2012
Герасимов Н. А. Российский экономический университет имени Г.В. Плеханова, 2004.
Added: Feb 4, 2013
Elena B. Starovoytenko. Psychology. PSY. Высшая школа экономики, 2013. No. 15.
“Achieving oneself” is not a subject of a systematic scientific research in Russian personality psychology. The goal of the current study is to justify the significance of such research in current socio-cultural and scientific context. “Achieving oneself” is understood in this paper as an integral reflectively mediated fulfillment of the I’s potential in leading vital relations hips of a person. The field of study is “the new personology”, the method is hermeneutics. This study offers a reflective model of the I’s potential towards the Other and presents an application of this model to the analysis of the process of achieving one self in a loving relationship.
Added: Jan 28, 2014
Зинченко В. П. В кн.: Человек в мире знания: К 80-летию Владислава Александровича Лекторского. М.: РОССПЭН, 2012. С. 360-387.
Added: Oct 24, 2012
Гриднева Е. А., Капранова К. О. В кн.: Коммуникативистика ХХI века: перспективы развития социально-гуманитарного знания: материалы VI Всероссийской научно-практической конференции, 19 марта 2010 г.. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2010. С. 87-93.
Added: Jul 6, 2012
Розанова Н. М.: Институт русского языка им. В.В. Виноградова, 2012.
Added: Nov 18, 2012
Большухин Л. Ю., Александрова М. А. Nová rusistika/ Новая русистика. 2009. № 2. С. 79-91.
Added: Mar 3, 2016
Кочетов Э. Г. Безопасность Евразии. 2010. № 2. С. 223-249.
Added: Oct 4, 2012