Концепция мониторинга нормативных правовых актов
A critical analysis of a new model of legal regula-tion of the norm-setting process in the Republic of Kazakhstan was carried out. Positive and negative aspects of the law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On legal
acts" were singled out. The author's model of the legal regulation of the norm-setting process is proposed, through the adoption of the Federal Law "On the sources (forms) of law in the Russian Federation, the Federal Law" On Regulatory Legal Acts in the Russian Federation "and specific normative legal acts.
This article is dedicated to overlook regulatory framework and realization of the constitution right of the legislative initiative in present Russia. The problems of understanding the right of the legislative initiative are being researched in the article and there is given an official position to this question, expressed in Art. 107 of the Regulations of the State Duma. It is noted, that in the Russian legislative process the given right is correlated with the legislative duty of the State Duma to consider this bill and the submitted documents with it and take an appropriate decision. On the basis of the analysis, it was concluded that the right of legislative initiative is implemented nonuniformly, because the state Duma enacts different laws on legal force. The question about from what moment the stage of the legislative initiative starts, at the same time, points of view are presented by both domestic and foreign authors. There is a conclusion made, that the real scope of authority subjects, that hold the right of legislative initiative in Russia is not the same, because it depends on the political and legal status of subjects of constitutional legal relations. The problem of the subject composition of persons who have the right of the legislative initiative, which is defined in Art. 104 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation is being discussed. The author comes to the conclusion, that there is an expansion in the subject composition of who have the right of legislative initiative in modern Russia, in which in addition to the General Prosecutor, the Ombudsman for Human and Citizen’s Rights, as well as the well-established large public organizations, should be added. It is noted, that the best form, in which the legal norms, that regulate the right of the legislative initiative will be fixed, is the Federal Law “On Regulatory Legal Acts in the Russian Federation”.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/