Иркутское радио (1920–1930 гг.)
In an article written on the basis of a scientific paper describes the current status of nepovezane with respect to a dispute between the "objectivist" and "subjectivity" on its essence and prospects. The author identifies key trends in the study of the new economic policy in the 2000's.: a reassessment of Soviet historiography, folding regional research schools, updating the history of everyday life of the 1920s, mass moods and behavior. It is the reference to the history of everyday life contributes to the process of formation of uniform fields of historiography bourgeoisie issues.
Appeal to the leaders and organs of the Bolshevik government, the authors examine how the documents, which focus and connect the structure and components of mentality, social relations and political practice. Analyzing the appeal to authority period 1917-1927, the authors come to the conclusion that the priority concept of the time was "freedom". The article traces the drift of popular sentiment from the desire to overcome the bondage of the old world to the disappointment, the post-revolutionary crisis of psychology in terms of NEP.
In the article the questions of the state industrial policy of the 1920-ies are considered from the perspective of neoinstitutional approach that identifies feedback between the economy and political institutions, and explore real and not only a formal management practices. It is shown that the NEP was not complete and holistic management system and consisted of a collection is not always agreed measures on the elimination of major imbalances of the economy. Management decision fits into the overall scheme approval mechanism for centralized management of state industry and market trend has been implemented mainly in the peripheral sectors of the economy. Attempts to fit the public sector economy to a market economy in order to overcome the latter was provided fertile ground for the crisis. A series of crises of the twenties (the financial crisis of 1922, "the crisis of sale" 1923, commodity hunger 1924-1925, the grain procurement crisis 1927-1928, etc.) was born at the intersection of the natural process of revival of market relations and active, but malokompetentnyh intervention of the party-state leadership. And measures taken to overcome another crisis contributed to a further narrowing of the market space.