В домике НАИва
The article applies the occulture theory by the British religion scientist C. Patridge to the realities of music culture. For this purpose, several forms of music occulture are defined; they exploit the sub/ jects of easternisation, nativism, and ecologism, as well as the types of musicians playing with its images: adept, commercial project, and bricoleur. An adept is a musician who represents a particular esoteric teaching; a commercial project is a musician or a group working in the genre or style that was aesthetically shaped by occulture, in this case their exploiting of occulture is of a purely commercial nature. A bricoleur is a musician who plays around with occulture themes, and puts their own creative vision in the first place, in other words, composes their piece of music with the occulture material at hand. This scheme is projected onto the modern Russian music culture, considering examples of all types of occulture influence in Russian music and demonstrates the heuristic nature of the occulture theory for its analysis. The adept type of musician is analysed drawing on the example of the Russian Rod/ novery movement, represented by groups like “Butterfly Temple”, “Svarga”, “Alkonost”, “Arkona”, and “Tverd”. This type also includes musicians who were strongly influenced by the Soviet esoteric underground (A. F. Sklyar, V. Shumov, S. Kuryokhin). The specifics of commercial projects is shown in the study by the groups “Aria”, “Knyazz” and festival culture. Bricoleurs’ music is analysed through B. Grebenshchikov, S. Kalugin, R. Anchevskaya and P. Korolenko. The author draws a conclusion that Russian musical culture largely follows the principles that were laid in the west and, similar to western culture, exploits occulture themes, but acquires its orig/ inal features in the music of bricoleurs.
Materials of the VI All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference on February 19, 2016 are devoted to the problems of contemporary art, considered in the aggregate of art, cultural, methodological and organizational-practical aspects.
The article considers the Views of L. N. Tolstoy not only as a representative, but also as a accomplisher of the Enlightenment. A comparison of his philosophy with the ideas of Spinoza and Diderot made it possible to clarify some aspects of the transition to the unique Tolstoy’s religious and philosophical doctrine. The comparison of General and specific features of the three philosophers was subjected to a special analysis. Special attention is paid to the way of thinking, the relation to science and the specifics of the worldview by Tolstoy and Diderot. An important aspect is researched the contradiction between the way of thinking and the way of life of the three philosophers.
Tolstoy's transition from rational perception of life to its religious and existential bases is shown. Tolstoy gradually moves away from the idea of a natural man to the idea of a man, who living the commandments of Christ. Starting from the educational worldview, Tolstoy ended by creation of religious and philosophical doctrine, which were relevant for the 20th century.
This important new book offers the first full-length interpretation of the thought of Martin Heidegger with respect to irony. In a radical reading of Heidegger's major works (from Being and Time through the ‘Rector's Address' and the ‘Letter on Humanism' to ‘The Origin of the Work of Art' and the Spiegel interview), Andrew Haas does not claim that Heidegger is simply being ironic. Rather he argues that Heidegger's writings make such an interpretation possible - perhaps even necessary.
Heidegger begins Being and Time with a quote from Plato, a thinker famous for his insistence upon Socratic irony. The Irony of Heidegger takes seriously the apparently curious decision to introduce the threat of irony even as philosophy begins in earnest to raise the question of the meaning of being. Through a detailed and thorough reading of Heidegger's major texts and the fundamental questions they raise, Haas reveals that one of the most important philosophers of the 20th century can be read with as much irony as earnestness. The Irony of Heidegger attempts to show that the essence of this irony lies in uncertainty, and that the entire project of onto-heno-chrono-phenomenology, therefore needs to be called into question.
The article is concerned with the notions of technology in essays of Ernst and Friedrich Georg Jünger. The special problem of the connection between technology and freedom is discussed in the broader context of the criticism of culture and technocracy discussion in the German intellectual history of the first half of the 20th century.