Book
Структурные изменения в российской промышленности
М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2004.
Chapters
Бессонов В. А., Воскобойников И. Б. В кн.: Структурные изменения в российской промышленности. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2004. Гл. 2. С. 55-90.
Added: Jan 27, 2013
Голикова В. В. В кн.: Структурные изменения в российской промышленности. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2004. Гл. 9. С. 274-293.
Added: May 31, 2013
Language:
Russian
Similar publications
Кузьминов И. Ф. В кн.: Инновационные и интегральные процессы в регионах и странах СНГ. М.: Медиа-ПРЕСС, 2011. С. 82-99.
Added: Dec 11, 2012
Боговиз А. В., Кожевина О. В. Вестник Университета (Государственный университет управления). 2012. № 12. С. 145-150.
Added: Mar 21, 2013
Added: Aug 23, 2012
Головачев С. С. В кн.: Договор о Европейской безопасности: импульс к развитию отношений России и Европы. М.: МГУП им. Ивана Федорова, 2011. Гл. 2. С. 111-133.
Added: May 28, 2012
Капелюшников Р. И. «Проблемы рынка труда». WP3. ГУ ВШЭ, 2011. № 01.
The paper attempts to estimate expropriation risks for shareholders in the Russian economy. On the basis of the survey of nearly 1000 manufacturing firms which was conducted in 2009 a series of special «ownership insecurity indices» is constructed and their variation by types of risks and firms is analyzed. Using various econometric techniques the study examines major determinants of ownership insecurity and evaluates its impact on firms investment and innovative activity. The analysis shows that the Russian economy continues to operate on a shaky basis of attenuated and insecure property rights and that under such condition incentives for economic agents to invest in any long-term projects turn out to be inevitably weak.
Added: Dec 22, 2012
Added: Jan 24, 2013
Куценко Е. С. В кн.: XII Международная научная конференция по проблемам развития экономики и общества. В четырех книгах. Книга 4.. Кн. 4. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2012. С. 495-504.
Added: Jul 3, 2013
Edited by: З. Саралиева Н. Новгород: Издательство НИСОЦ, 2010.
Added: May 14, 2013
Added: Dec 19, 2012
Урнов М. Ю. Политическая теория и политический анализ. WP14. Высшая школа экономики, 2014
Russian political, analytical and scientific publications depict a future of the country mainly in a framework of the “Great Power paradigm”. This paradigm uses such an alternatives as Great Power versus Catastrophe (at times, Global), Great Power versus failed state, Great Power versus something foggy and dim (just as that-what-must-not-be-named), or fixes solely on one position – Great/leading power. The trouble is that it carries out a discussion on Russian future into a realm of irreality. The analysis of Russian resource capabilities shows that over the next decade, the country is likely to lose its Great power status. So the real dilemma of Russian political future is much more prosy and much more tragic than “Great Power versus Global Catastrophe”, it is an option between (at best) a regional power comfortable enough for its citizens and existing in its current borders and (at worst) a degradation and disintegration of the country. Meanwhile it is not so easy to achieve or even to come close to the best position. For this the country has to solve a lot of complicated tasks, including passing through the deep and painful consciousness revolution – that is to reject a mythology of its own greatness and elaborate a rational, critical view at its capabilities. Despite a gravity of choice between “a host of bitter truths” of reality and “an uplifting us illusion” of political mythology, the preference for “bitter truths” seems to be the only way to prevent the worst future scenario.
Added: Jan 16, 2015
Авдашева С. Б., Горейко Н. А. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2010. № 07.
Added: Apr 2, 2013
Ч. 1. Волгоград: Волгоградское научное издательство, 2010.
Added: Jan 18, 2013
Березовский Д. С. Вестник Московского государственного университета печати. 2011. № 2.
Added: Mar 3, 2014
Вишневская Н. Т. Проблемы рынка труда. WP3. Высшая школа экономики, 2005. № 03.
The paper examines the institute of minimum wage in developed and transition economies and in a number of the developing countries. First of all the institutional mechanism of minimum wage fixing is considered. One of the sections explores the dynamics of absolute and relative levels of minimum wage. The special attention is paid to the impact of the institute of minimum wage on the labour market. The author considers the mechanism of transmission of the minimum wage increases on the employment and unemployment dynamics. The paper also contains the result of the empirical research. The experience of many countries witnesses that large increases in minimum wage levels lead to the stagnation of the employ-ment, especially of the disadvantaged groups. The negative effect is larger for the companies with higher share of labour costs and more active use of unqualified labour, that is small businesses and agricultural enterprises. One of the main conclusions is that the minimum wage is not an effective tool of the poverty reduction as the majority of the recipients live in households of average and upper average income.
Added: Oct 13, 2012