Знания о политике: как получить и где применить? (27 сентября — 12 октября 2019 г.): Сборник материалов по итогам цикла региональных круглых столов
The book includes materials on the results of a series of regional round tables “Knowledge about politics: how to get it and where to apply it?”. The events were held from September 27 to October 12, 2019 in 20 regions of Russia, covering all federal districts of the country. The organizer was the Council of youth political scientists of the Russian Association of Political Science.
The book contains written abstracts, transcripts of speeches, as well as analytical descriptions of key events of all round tables. The main topics covered by the participants: understanding of the concept of “knowledge of politics”, especially the profession of political scientist. Also discussed were sources of acquisition and methods of processing information and knowledge, problems of political science education, the scope of application of the knowledge and skills of a political scientist, and the social activity of youth scientists.
The book is intended for political scientists, everyone who is interested in the problems of political science and the development of the political science community.
This chapter is about relations between everyday and academic knowledge in professional knowledge and practice. The author faces to classical and contemporary sociological theories of professionalism.
his book contains abstracts and complete papers approved by the Conference Review Committee. Authors are responsible for the content and accuracy. Opinions expressed may not necessarily reflect the position of the International Scientific Council of SGEM. Information in the SGEM 2014 Conference Proceedings is subject to change without notice. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose, without the express written permission of the International Scientific Council of SGEM.
Inclusive Development of Society contains papers that were originally presented at the 2018 International Congress on Management and Technology in Knowledge, Service, Tourism & Hospitality (SERVE 2018), held 6-7 October and 15-16 December 2018 in Kuta, Bali, Indonesia and 18-19 October, 2018 at The Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-don, Russia. The contributions deal with various interdisciplinary research topics, particularly in the fields of social sciences, economics and the arts. The papers focus especially on such topics as language, cultural studies, economics, behavior studies, political sciences, media and communication, psychology and human development. The theoretical research studies included here should provide a solid foundation for the development of new tools that explore the possibilities of developing tourism, hospitality, service industries in Knowledge Economic Era, and the empirical papers will advance our knowledge regarding the impact of information technologies in organizations’ and institutions’ practices. These proceedings should be of interest to academics and professionals in the wider field of social sciences, including disciplines such as education, psychology, tourism and knowledge management.
The authors of the current study have interviewed a number of leading Russian historians in an attempt to find out how the scholars understand public history and how they do it. The article presents an analysis of historians’ views of the aims and motives behind their public lectures, of the models of behaviour, forms of representations of historical material, as well as their reflections on the system of argumentation and the language used at addressing an un-professional audience.
The paper analyzes the contents and objectives of ‘public social science’, the relationship between scholarly and popular knowledge, conventions governing the representation of scientific knowledge outside the academic context, and the transfer of scholarly knowledge from academic to media environment. Public science is treated as a specific type of judgment and practice, thus the analysis of ‘public science’ cover cognitive aspects as well as social ones.
The paper analyzes the contents and objectives of ‘public social science’, the relationship between scholarly and popular knowledge, conventions governing the representation of the past outside the academic context, and the transfer of scholarly knowledge from academic to media environment.
Public history is treated as a specific type of historical judgment and historical practice, thus the analysis of ‘public history’ cover cognitive aspects as well as social ones.
Students' internet usage attracts the attention of many researchers in different countries. Differences in internet penetration in diverse countries lead us to ask about the interaction of medium and culture in this process. In this paper we present an analysis based on a sample of 825 students from 18 Russian universities and discuss findings on particularities of students' ICT usage. On the background of the findings of the study, based on data collected in 2008-2009 year during a project "A сross-cultural study of the new learning culture formation in Germany and Russia", we discuss the problem of plagiarism in Russia, the availability of ICT features in Russian universities and an evaluation of the attractiveness of different categories of ICT usage and gender specifics in the use of ICT.
The results of cross-cultural research of implicit theories of innovativeness among students and teachers, representatives of three ethnocultural groups: Russians, the people of the North Caucasus (Chechens and Ingushs) and Tuvinians (N=804) are presented. Intergroup differences in implicit theories of innovativeness are revealed: the ‘individual’ theories of innovativeness prevail among Russians and among the students, the ‘social’ theories of innovativeness are more expressed among respondents from the North Caucasus, Tuva and among the teachers. Using the structural equations modeling the universal model of values impact on implicit theories of innovativeness and attitudes towards innovations is constructed. Values of the Openness to changes and individual theories of innovativeness promote the positive relation to innovations. Results of research have shown that implicit theories of innovativeness differ in different cultures, and values make different impact on the attitudes towards innovations and innovative experience in different cultures.