Book
Гражданское право и процесс. Избранные труды.
М.: Юрайт, 2020.
Крашенинников Е. А., Байгушева Ю. В., Власова А. В., Грачев В. В., Бутнев В. В., Шевченко А. С.
Editor-in-chief:
Ю. В. Байгушева
Compiler:
Ю. В. Байгушева
Similar publications
Давыденко Д. Л. Вестник Высшего Арбитражного Суда Российской Федерации. 2008. № 12. С. 82-89.
Added: Jul 24, 2012
Михеева Л. Ю. В кн.: Гражданское законодательство. Статьи. Комментарии. Практика.. Вып. 36. Алматы: 2010. С. 0,5.
Added: Mar 28, 2013
Сухарева А. Е. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2017.
Added: Mar 2, 2018
Чувилин А. Е. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2013. No. 28.
One of the main aims for the argumentation theorists around the world is to define standards for the soundness of argumentation. Many authors, such as Chaim Perelman or Steven Toulmin, have emphasized the role that the field of argumentation plays in defining such standards. Judicial argumentation is strongly connected with legal procedure and substantive laws. But can we say that some rules of judicial argumentation are vested in legal rules? Can we derive standards of judicial argumentation from substantive and procedural laws? This paper answers these questions on the basis of Russian and US legislation. The present treatise is aimed at outlining the main aspects of the problem and elaborating directions for future research.
Added: Dec 10, 2013
Михеева Л. Ю. В кн.: Сборник материалов международной научно-практической конференции по медицинскому праву. 2010. С. 0,5.
Added: Mar 28, 2013
Postylyakov S. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2015. No. WP BRP 55/LAW/2015.
The article deals with relevant problems of determination of the objective limits of the prejudgment using the prejudgment of the particular types of court rulings as an example. The author concludes that the concept of «circumstances» should be defined as facts and established on their basis legal relations. The author considers that the court orders, the judgments in absentia, the judgments of dismissal due to the approval of the settlement as well as the higher court rulings that verify legality of previous judgments not verifying validity should be excluded from the objective limits of the prejudgment. The author analyzes rules of the draft of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of 2000 and comes to the conclusion that Article 61 of the current Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation requires to be amended
Added: Oct 8, 2015
Козлов А. В. В кн.: Вопросы гражданского права в деятельности правоохранительных органов: Материалы Международной научно-практической конференции (Нижний Новгород, 23 мая 2012 года). Н. Новгород: Нижегородская академия МВД России, 2012. С. 264-276.
Added: Dec 10, 2012
Borisova T. Y. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 05.
The article describes and analyzes the legislative politics of revolutionary regimes in Russia in 1917-1918. The author aims to demonstrate the political meaning of the form of early Soviet legislation and its legitimizing effect. The revolutionary legislators often used specific language in the new laws as a vehicle of legitimacy, i.e. to make the people comply. The two main types of legal language used by the Bolsheviks can be interpreted from the perspective of different types of legitimacy. The revolutionary strategy used propagandistic legislation, written in the language of lay people, which urged them to act according to the new law. It can be seen as a request for acts of the people to legitimize the soviets. On the contrary, the traditional strategy employed old bureaucratic means of writing and distributing legislation to the local soviets. The language used by this strategy was closed to the understanding of a lay audience and implied traditions of obeying the law written in familiar legal language, which in turn implied rational/legal legitimacy. The second strategy had already become dominant after the first months of the Bolshevik revolution. This observation demonstrates that from the very beginning of their rule, Soviet leaders approached legislative policy from a technocratic point of view, which determined the further development of Soviet legal theory and practice.
Added: Jul 20, 2012
Mayanskiy E. arxiv.org. math. Cornell University, 2013. No. 5150.
We list all finite abelian groups which act effectively on smooth cubic fourfolds.
Added: Nov 19, 2013
Тенилова Т. Л. Юридическая техника. 2009. № 3. С. 309-316.
Added: Dec 12, 2012
Edited by: В. М. Баранов, П. Н. Панченко, А. В. Козлов Т. 1. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2009.
Added: May 24, 2012
Лукьянова Е. А. Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2007. № 15. С. 4-9.
Added: Nov 19, 2013
Edited by: П. Н. Панченко, А. В. Козлов Т. 1. Н. Новгород: ООО "Стимул-СТ", 2010.
Added: May 24, 2012
Totyev K. Y. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2014
This article is devoted to the legitimation and application of the standards of ex post and ex ante by courts and the executive authorities in the sphere of competition regulation. The postulates of ex post and ex ante are considered as legal principles. The principle of ex post is intended solely for judicial and administrative application; it has a deontological framework; it assumes that the legality of the activity of economic entities is assessed only on the basis of positive legal criteria in terms of the subjective rights violated; it is limited to a particular case. The traditional approach to the principle of ex post limits the scope of its application on the subjects and excessively expands its objects. The postulate of ex ante has a utilitarian basis which assumes the assessment of the application of relevant rules in the future. One of the main aims of the article is to refute the common view of lawyers and economists that a legislator applies principle of ex ante not being bound by principle of ex post, while it is the other way around for the courts and the executive authorities. The principle of ex ante may be applied not only in the process of the creation of new rules but also at the application stage for existing rules on economic competition. This is justified because the arguments of the courts and the executive authorities about a refusal to take into account the consequences of a decision in a particular case are not convincing.
Added: Apr 17, 2014
Edited by: В. М. Баранов, Д. Краснов Н. Новгород: Нижегородская академия МВД России, 2009.
Added: May 24, 2012