40-летие Хельсинских соглашений и преобразование Европы
EU-Russia relations are on the stage of fundamental rethinking. Unshakeable foundations of mutual understanding and trust have been undemined. Ukraine crisis demonstrated an absolutely different vision of european security by Russia and West. New Helsinki can become the platform for launch of common free trade zone from Lisbon o Vladivostok.
The author rises the issues of EEU recognition be the european colleagues, sinorussian relations as well as the future of Europe with an appeal to cooperation on common problems from Lisbon to Vladivostok.
Marina Larionova and Vitaliy Nagornov of the Moscow High School of Economics review the prospects for progress in the five key areas for technological modernization - energy efficiency, nuclear technology, space technology and communications, medical technology and strategic information technology. The authors also examine the most important legal changes for stimulating investment and innovation, such as amendments to the list of strategic enterprises and acts on special economic zones. They emphasise the importance of higher education reform in ensuring the success of the modernization agenda. Finally they look at EU-Russia cooperation in practice taking as examples various cross border initiatives.
This study focuses on such a complex issue as an energy security. The energy security is often considered from the consumer's point of view. But it's an "umbrella term", covering a lot of concerns. This study looks at how the concept of demand security came about and how it evolved. The chapter examines requests of consuming and producing countries. Energy has a significant role in the relations between Russia and EU and this case is considered in the chapter.
The article presents an overview of EU-Russia relations in the sphere of information security. Actors' stances in the sphere as well as obstacles for and prespectives of cooperation are discussed.
This review brings out clearly the many issues concerning the EU-Russia modernisation partnership. Perhaps the most important is the differences within Russia about how far and how fast to proceed with modernisation. President Dmitry Medvedev has spoken of the need to reform Russia’s “backward” economy, to end its “primitive reliance” on oil and gas. Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, seems not to share this sense of urgency, arguing recently that modernisation was already under way, “but we need to make this development quite gradual”. Mr Putin has also been far less vocal than Mr Medvedev on the need to tackle corruption and take measures to strengthen the rule of law.
The monograph is devoted to the fundamental issues of European security and reasons of the the Russia-West confrontation after 25 years of the end the Cold War. The analysis of the key element for external context of European security - techtonic processes of Eurasia - was implemented. We are talking about the formation oa a new quality of geopolitical and geoeconomic community of Great Eurasia, based on cooperation and co-development of its constituent countries and on a significant reduction of geopolitical competition.
European integration is going through difficult times, not only due to the crisis, but also because the logic that determines the development of the EU. It forces politicians to think in realistic terms. In a close partnership with the United States, the European powers are entering the global politic arena. For Russia, this is fraught with more complex partnership with the EU, as well as with single European countries that have revised their priorities.
In the article makes analysis of the negotiations which preceded the conclusion of the Polish-Soviet Pact of non-aggression in 1932. The study is based on the sources that input firstly on scientific field. Author contradicted the prevailing in the scientific literature opinion that by the Soviet initiative negotiations was resumed in 1930. The article discusses the influence on the negotiation process of third countries. Agreement was more a result of changes in the political situation in the world, rather than just an expression of good will. It was possible only because of the weakening of Poland's position in Europe. Politics of Poland and the Soviet Union were equally not inclined to see in Pact real guarantees and commitments, but saw it as an opportunity to normalize relations, as well as demonstrations to the third countries.