Book
Есть ли будущее у контроля над вооружениями?

The chapter explores international peace and security as the most important global public goods, given their role in creating conditions for sustainable development. The authors take stock of the key problems and contradictions of safeguarding international peace and security and examines the history and future prospects of the EU’s CFSP.
In terms of international law the article substantiates the idea that the drug production in Afghanistan should be qualified by the UN Security Council as a threat to international peace and security.
The paper takes stock of NATO-Russia relations in the post-Soviet period and outlines the prospects for cooperation between them in future. NATO’s framework is seen as a very important mechanism for engaging Russia in an international dialogue. The authors conclude that for Russia, which prefers Realpolitik and the balance of power to the new liberal and postmodern policies, it is sometimes easier to deal with security-minded NATO than with the “post-heroic” EU.
In the research study, covering the period up to 2035, is characterized by fundamental trends, under the influence of which formed the shape of the world in 20 years. The prediction task is to identify the world, the challenges and opportunities that can be used in the interests of Russia, ensuring her the role of an active participant in the development of the rules of the future world order. There is the broad analysis of trends of world development in the areas of ideas and ideology, politics, innovation as well as economics, social sphere and international security, the challenges of globalization and regionalism. The final section of the book deals with strategic recommendations for Russia. For employees of government and management, scientific, expert and business community. Will be useful to students majouring in international Affairs.
The chapter explores international peace and security as the most important global public goods, given their role in creating conditions for sustainable development. The authors take stock of the key problems and contradictions of safeguarding international peace and security and examines the history and future prospects of the EU’s CFSP.
The article deals with the processes of building the information society and security in the CIS in accordance with modern conditions. The main objective is to review existing mechanisms for the formation of a common information space in the Eurasian region, regarded as one of the essential aspects of international integration. The theoretical significance of the work is to determine the main controls of the regional information infrastructure, improved by the development of communication features in a rapid process.The practical component consists in determining the future policies of the region under consideration in building the information society. The study authors used historical-descriptive approach and factual analysis of events having to do with drawing the contours of today's global information society in the regional refraction.
The main result is the fact that the development of information and communication technologies, and network resources leads to increased threats of destabilization of the socio-political situation in view of the emergence of multiple centers that generate the ideological and psychological background. Keeping focused information policy can not be conceived without the collective participation of States in the first place, members of the group leaders of integration - Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. Currently, only produced a comprehensive approach to security in the information field in the Eurasian region, but the events in the world, largely thanks to modern technology, make the search for an exit strategy with a much higher speed. The article contributes to the science of international relations, engaging in interdisciplinary thinking that is associated with a transition period in the development of society. A study of current conditions in their relation to the current socio-political patterns of the authors leads to conclusions about the need for cooperation with the network centers of power in the modern information environment, the formation of alternative models of networking, especially in innovation and scientific and technical areas of information policy, and expanding the integration of the field in this region on the information content.
This special publication for the 2012 New Delhi Summit is a collection of articles by government officials from BRICS countries, representatives of international organizations, businessmen and leading researchers.
The list of Russian contributors includes Sergei Lavrov, Foreign Minister of Russia, Maxim Medvedkov, Director of the Trade Negotiations Department of the Russian Ministry of Economic Development, Vladimir Dmitriev, Vnesheconombank Chairman, Alexander Bedritsky, advisor to the Russian President, VadimLukov, Ambassador-at-large of the Russian Foreign Affairs Ministry, and representatives of the academic community.
The publication also features articles by the President of Kazakhstan NursultanNazarbayev and internationally respected economist Jim O’Neil, who coined the term “BRIC”. In his article Jim O’Neil speculates about the future of the BRICS countries and the institution as a whole.
The publication addresses important issues of the global agenda, the priorities of BRICS and the Indian Presidency, the policies and competitive advantages of the participants, as well as BRICS institutionalization, enhancing efficiency and accountability of the forum.