Реализация свободы предоставления услуг: принцип взаимного признания
The main goal of the article is to reveal the role of mutual recognition principle in the realization of freedom to provide services and to appraise the effectiveness of its application. The author stresses the polysemantic feature of analyzed principle in the light of different doctrinal approaches to its substance. On the basis of the analysis of secondary EU law, EU case-law and diverse doctrinal views the author defines the content of mutual recognition principle. The article contains a comparative analysis of goods and services as objects of cross-border economic relations and on the basis of this research the author determines peculiarities of the application of mutual recognition principle in services sector. The study examines the application of mutual recognition principle and the author formulates factors restricting its realization. A particular attention is paid to the analysis of EU legislation concerning the recognition of professional qualifications.
The study aimed to analyze the EU contribution towards defining the G8 priorities and values as well as implementation within the G8 the main global governance functions: domestic political governance, deliberation, direction setting, decision making, delivery and global governance development. A specialized data base was formed, comprised of documents of both institutions. The programme allowed to undertake a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the evidence base. The content analysis of the documents focused on priorities, values and commitments shared by the G8 and the EU and specific to each institution, on the basis of search, accounting and comparison of the number of documents, references and symbols and their distribution by priorities and functions in accordance with functional analysis methodology.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/