Апелляционное, кассационное и надзорное производство в российском уголовном процессе: ожидания практики
What are the drawbacks of the legislator in the regulation of the appeals, the appeal and the supervisory review of criminal cases will inevitably give rise to problems in practice • How do I resolve a conflict that appeared in the Code rules.
The subject of this article - is the research of public interest in Russian civil proceedings. The author compares the private interest and the public interest as well the public, state and society interest in law and draws conclusions about their similarities and differences. The article deals with the specific manifestation of public interest in civil proceeding (abstract and specific) and investigates problems of using this term in the text of the law and practice.
The aim of this article is to describe actors’ sense of justice that they intuitively embody in everyday life situations. To make everyday meanings of justice explicit we focus on an analysis of a very particular type of situation denunciations/justifications that appeared in everyday disputes in late soviet Russia.
Based on a comprehensive analysis of regulations the features of record keeping practices development in the course of performance by public officials and authorities of their functions to process citizens appeals under “prikaz”, collegiate and ministerial system of government is discussed. The author emphasizes that the general framework of the document workflow in the above context has been developed as early as in the days of the “prikaz” system establishment, while the subsequent legislative initiatives were designed to improve the manner and means of complaints administration in Russia.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/