Защита прав спортсменов в делах о допинге: процессуальный аспект
The article discusses the procedural aspect in proceedings on cases of violation of anti-doping rules by athletes. Problems are being raised about the need to amend the civil procedural legislation of Russia related to the possibility of postponing the proceedings for the reinstatement of an athlete dismissed for doping for the period of consideration of his appeal in CAS / TAS, as well as some aspects of enforcement proceedings in this category of cases.
The development of the sports sector led to the appearance of doping in this area, in the 21st century a new direction in doping emerged - technological doping. The author analyzes the use of technological doping, taking into account the development of the sports sector, its distinctive features from doping in a classical understanding. As a result, the author came to the conclusions about the need for a clear regulation of the problem of the use of technological doping by WADA and sports organizations.
In the light of recent achievements in the field of sports law - the newest sphere of Russian jurisprudence - the legal aspects of the regulation of contractual relations in the field of sports are considered.
The chapter is devoted to the specifics of labour regulation of sportsmen and coaches.
the article considers the theoretical aspects of the anti-doping rules, compares the rules of the international doping regulation and the Russian doping regulation. As a result of the analysis of the rules contained in the anti-doping rules, the author comes to the conclusion that, for the moment, the definition of doping, which is contained in these norms, is not complete in content and thus the author offers its own version of the term of doping. The article considers the standards of proof established by the anti-doping rules, rules on the rights of athletes and the procedure for forming a list of substances prohibited for use in sports. Separately, the author make an analysis of the possibility of obtaining permission for the therapeutic use of doping. According to the results of the research, the author concludes on the necessity to expand the list of athlete’s rights in order to exercise their right to rights protection.
Novel biotechnologies drastically enhance human capacities. However, initial optimism concerning new methods of therapy and body modification gradually gives way to fears that technologies can easily get out of hand and alter human nature in an undesirable way. Philosophers approach bioethical discussion from various assumptions and perspectives: while some of them believe that new technologies enhance and better human beings, others are concerned those technological innovations can be perilous. This paper overviews the discussion between utilitarians and bioconservatives on the extent to which human enhancement technologies should be permitted. I suggest an alternative communitarian approach to consider human beings primarily as members of political communities and recognition-seekers. I take the debate on doping legalization in sports to demonstrate how communitarianism doesn’t reject new technologies and still argues for making them work for preservation and flourishing of human communities. All major decisions on regulating biotechnologies should be made by communities themselves in a democratic way and drawing on bioethical expertise.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/