«Что касается трудов нашего Совещания, то с ними произошла неожиданная метаморфоза». Письма из фонда А.Ф. Кони о разработке Временных правил о повременных изданиях 24 ноября 1905 г.
Publication of A.P. Sopova and A.S. Tumanova includes the letters from N.V. Shakhovskoy and D.F. Kobeko to A.F. Koni, which have been revealed in the State Archive of the Russian Federation (GA RF). The letters present the details of the process of drafting of the new Temporary Rules for periodicals of 24 November 1905 and contain information about the authors of the project and the peculiarities of the legislative process in the revolutionary crisis.
This paper presents the findings of a research conducted in Russian and French archives which sheds new light on early life and intellectual biography of a famous philosopher and historian of science Alexandre Koyré (1892-1964). During the investigation some important details of his revolutionary activity in Russian Empire were discovered. A special attention is paid to the history of Koyré’s family and to his relation to social-revolutionary groups in Rostov-on-Don. Documents found among historical police records kept in the State Archive of the Russian Federation give a possibility to better understand a history of the police and juridical persecution of Koyré during his late scholar years in Rostov. They give also a definitive answer to the question on exact year of Koyré’s arrival in Gottingen when he became a disciple of Edmund Husserl.
Press regulation in Russian Empire was going through a crisis at the beginning of the XXth century, which was caused not only by excessive strictness and at the same time ineffectiveness of the censorship, but also by archaic and contradictory legislation. The existing Statute of Censorship of 1890 was an amended version of the Statute of Censorship of 1828. It included rules on preliminary censorship in the spirit of the Polizeistaat, rules on judicial responsibility, which protected the principle of legality, and the system of administrative sanctions borrowed from Napoleon’s III France, which broadened the sphere of administrative arbitrariness. Many attempts to elaborate a new Statute failed. Instead new “Temporary Rules” regulating selected issues were adopted. For example, the 1865 censorship reform was carried out through the adoption of such Temporary Rules. These Temporary Rules were included into the next edition of the Digest of Laws of the Russian Empire in the chapter with the Statute of Censorship. The editing procedure had a merely technical nature and for this reason a lot of provisions, adopted with different purposes in different epochs did not match each other. The priority of the reform that started in December 1904 was to eliminate the inconsistency and contradiction in press regulation. During the Revolution, the government was forced to take more measures than initially planned: the preliminary censorship was eliminated for most periodicals and the administrative sanctions were abolished. However, the Revolution prevented the reform from being completed. In February 1905, the Special Conference for the Drafting of a New Statute on the Press started its work, which was interrupted by the all-Russian October political strike. And after the adoption of the October Manifesto Prime Minister Sergei Witte hastened to adopt the Temporary Rules in November 1905 to set the boundaries on the exercise of freedom of speech. The Special Conference’s project of the Statute on the Press was unclaimed in the subsequent legislation. Thus, the purpose of elaboration and adopting of a new Statute on Press remained unfulfilled, and the outdated Statute of Censorship of 1890 underwent editorial changes, but remained in force.
The paper examines the principles for the supervision of financial conglomerates proposed by BCBS in the consultative document published in December 2011. Moreover, the article proposes a number of suggestions worked out by the authors within the HSE research team.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/