Компетентный суд и применимое право при привлечении директора должника к ответственности в трансграничном банкротстве
The article raises the question of determining the jurisdiction and applicable law for directors’ liability for the breach of insolvency-related duties: the problem is posed on a global scale, on a regional (European) scale, and in a more local Russian context. The emphasis is made on the experience of the European Union in resolving the issues. The author analyses the chain of cases from Gourdain to H. v. H.K. to Kornhaas, where the Court of Justice has gradually clarified which cases fall within the competence of the bankruptcy court (vis attractiva concursus) and which cases come within the scope of the principle of lex fori concursus. The article discusses the phenomenon of insolvencification of directors’ liability, i.e. corporate provisions being reclassified as bankruptcy provisions with a view to applying the lex concursus. It raises the following questions: how does insolvencification of directors’ liability correspond to the freedom of establishment and corporate mobility? Would the insolvencification of directors’ liability lead to regulatory competition because of the States’ desire to attract investors, minimising the standards of management responsibility and thus making their territories more attractive for business? The EU experience can be useful in the light of the discussion of the prospects for the establishment of cross-border insolvency regulation for the EAEU countries
This article is an attempt to highlight the issues, associated with a latency of crimes under Art. 170 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and to propose mechanisms to detect these criminal violations. The author analyzes the reasons hindering the identification of the crimes, described in the article. In the present article also discusses the features of investigative jurisdiction of a crime under Art. 170 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which may also influence the degree of latency of this crime.
The Chapter on Russia deals with the particularities of decision-making methodology used by the Supreme Court of Russia, in comparison with that of the US Supreme Court. It offers an overview of the Russian Supreme Court jurisdiction, justiciability and standing and the main issues arising in these areas.
This book is devoted to the international dispute resolution in various contexts.
The textbook in accordance with state educational standards sets out the main provisions of an in-depth course on Private International Law. Volume 1 deals with the General part of Private International Law theory - the concept, object, system, method, sources. Volume 2 examines specific branches of private international law - the law of persons, international property law, international contract law, private international transport law, private international currency law, international intellectual property law, international tort law, international inheritance law, international family law. Volume 3 highlighted procedural and substantive procedural industry in the system of private international law: international civil procedure, international commercial arbitration, cross-border insolvency (an international bankruptcy law) and international notarial law. All theoretical constructs are illustrated with examples from judicial practice, legal norms and international legal instruments. Analysis of Russian legislation takes into account all the innovations made in the relevant legal acts. For bachelors, undergraduates, graduate students and professors of universities and law faculties of universities and other educational institutions, specializing in international business; economists and legal practitioners.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/