Якутск: Арктический институт культуры и искусств, 2015.
Added: Dec 10, 2015
Замятин Д. Н. В кн.: Город как вызов. 2014. С. 53-61.
Added: Jan 29, 2018
Замятин Д. Н. Современные проблемы сервиса и туризма. 2015. Т. 9. № 2. С. 25-31.
Geo-cultural regional policy is associated with the actualization of the real identity of communities, people and events that can convert and transform the real image of the city. It should be focused on people and not on tangible or intan- gible objects. This is its essential difference from traditional regional policy. Geo-cultural branding of an area is not a traditional branding area that exists in western branding and marketing for- mats and is now developing on Russian soil. This activity is related to the cultivation areas of images, which are impor- tant for the cohesion of territorial communities. It can be a non-profit or commercial, but, anyway, the main purpose of geo-cultural branding cannot be initially commercial, it is focused not on profit but on the development of the identity of the city (and wider - regional) communities and the events that actualize the image of the city. At the end of XX - the beginning XXI centuries the concept of genius loci has become part of popular culture, one of the tools for development of tourism and marketing of areas, used in the protection and promotion of cultural heritage. As part of humanitarian geography the concept of “genius loci” is semantically correlated with the notions of cultural land- scape as an object of heritage, local (spatial) myth, symbolic topography, geographical image. Particularly productive this notion in research on literature, geography, geography and the geography of aesthetic art, landscape architecture and garden art. Characteristics of image resources of cities and territories in the context of geo-cultural branding should include an analysis of the possibilities of using space imagery of geniuses and specific representations of these images within geocultural regional policy.
Added: Dec 10, 2015
Замятин Д. Н. Библиотечное дело. 2015. № 4. С. 5-10.
Added: Dec 10, 2015
Троцук И. В. Крестьяноведение. 2017. Т. 1. № 1. С. 148-165.
Added: Dec 9, 2016
Черных А. И. Политическая теория и политический анализ. WP14. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. № 03.
Added: May 3, 2012
Savelieva I. M. Humanities. HUM. Basic Research Programme, 2011. No. 02.
This study researches some of the most recent theories (elaborated by historians and social scientists) applied to the practice of historical research. The object of this research includes ideas, concepts, notions, methods of scholarly analysis of past social reality, as well as the emergence of new interdisciplinary fields, mutual borrowings and interventions. In this connection, the opposite process — the historization of some very disparate disciplinary discourses — is briefly addressed. It includes especially historical aspects of anthropology and sociology in the coming century. The research is based on information from journals specialized in history and theory, on leading history journals which demonstrate the state of art in various research areas, on sociological journals publishing material on historical sociology and on monographs from 1995—2010.
Added: Apr 12, 2012
Татарко А. Н. Психология образования в поликультурном пространстве. 2012. Т. 17. № 1. С. 47-55.
Added: Sep 12, 2012
Таллинн: Таллинн, 2012.
Added: Dec 26, 2012
Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10), Valletta, Malta, 17-23 May 2010
Valletta: ELRA, 2010.
Added: Dec 17, 2012
Скиперских А. В. Свободная мысль. 2005. № 8. С. 119-203.
Added: Oct 28, 2014
Черных А. И. Политическая теория и политический анализ. WP14. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. № 04.
Added: May 11, 2012
Тулякова И. И., Бочкарева Н. С. Мировая литература в контексте культуры. 2008. № 3(1). С. 150-154.
Added: Dec 11, 2014