О некоторых вопросах раскрытия доказательств в арбитражном процессе
The author supports V.A. Musin's concept, that a full-fledged discovery of evidence has to be introduced in the Russian arbitration procedure law. This would ensure the compliance with the procedural rights of the parties to dispute, improve the stability and predictability of justice and prevent the forgery of evidence. The author analyses all possible sanctions for untimely discovery of evidence and concludes that the most effective one is considering such evidence impermissible and returning it to the party of the dispute. The author also shares his personal memories of Valeriy Abramovich Musin.
The author of article, E.P.Gavrilov, doctor of sciences, professor of the chair of the civil law of the state university Нigher school of economy proves that the legal protection of the discoveries and innovation proposals in Russia is not and should not be present.
This article is devoted to distinctive features of family trust as one of the forms of cross-border accumulation and movement of capital in the English Law. The author analyzed legal adavantages of family trust in the context of assets and investments accumulation and management, defined subjective structure of trust matters, which includes not only trust settlor, trustee and beneficiary but also protector. The author gave special consideration to legislation and case law in respect of private trust companies business activity as trustees according to the English Law.
The author substantiates the thesis that an arbitration court can reclaim from a party to the dispute evidence, that is necessary for the other party to ground its arguments and objections. If the court has reclaimed an evidence, and the party fails to submit it, such party is considered to have conceded facts, claimed by the other party.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/