Правовое регулирование процедур обжалования решений Королевской налоговой и таможенной службы Великобритании
The organization structure and the forms of decisions of the Eurasian Economic Commission were investigated. The author analyzes the making procedures of decisions and recommendations of the Council and the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission.
Arguing about the juridical nature of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, taken in particular constitutional review, the author of this article concludes that the acts in question constitute a normative interpretation case law, equal in their legal power to forceverifiable the rules and have in some cases retroactive.
In this chapter I make an attempt to reconstruct the risk-responsibility link. On the one hand, the analysis departs from the concept of risk, assuming that the interpretation of this concept – as a danger, a probable event or a rational decision – will inevitably impact on the conceptualization of the normative dimension and, in particular, understanding the specificity of responsibility. On the other hand, I propose a classification of responsibility types that allows to make explicit the specificity of responsibility within each approach to risk analysis. Elicitation of the normative dimension in existing risk-responsibility link interpretations helps me to identify “blind spots”, i.e. ways for further theoretical elaboration of this link. E.g. I describe the possibilities for integrating a normative dimension into studies based on an understanding of risk as a decision.