Рublication was prepared on the basis of norms of the modern Russian legislation on labor disputes in accordance with state educational standards of higher professional education on the subject "Labor Law of Russia" (course "Labour disputes"). Its main aim is to help students in mastering the basic theoretical and practical knowledge and competences for the consideration and resolution of individual and collective labor disputes. Material contains general, special and peculiar parts. The general part deals with theoretical questions of labor disputes: concept, causes, law, principles, types and location of labor disputes in the labor law system. The special part contains sections on the procedure for dealing with individual and collective labor disputes, as well as the settlement of labor disputes certain categories of employees (civil servants, judges, prosecutors, foreign employees). Questions of foreign experience of labor disputes are considered in a special part of the tutorial. A special place is given to the problems of labor disputes and the prospects of development of Russian legislation on labor disputes.Each part includes relevant case studies (CBS and courts of general jurisdiction). For teachers, bachelors, masters and post-graduate law schools, as well as entrepreneurs, heads of organizations and personnel services, as well as those interested in labor disputes.
The article examines topical theoretical and practical issues of termination of employment agreement initiated by the employer under Article 81, part 1, para. 1 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation, i.e. in case of dissolution of a company or cancellation of sole proprietorship.
Трудовой договор, расторжение, ликвидация организации, работник, employment agreement, Termination, company dissolution, employee
The article provides a comparative legal of the nature of social danger with other criminal law and civil phenomena. It proves that social danger is correlated with law and pertains exclusively to criminal law. The author suggests that harm should be distinguished from social danger which has institutional rather than predicate importance from criminal law.