?
Транспарентность в научных журналах по био- и пищевым технологиям: сравнительный анализ редакционных политик на основе принципов COPE, OASPA, WAME и DOAJ
Introduction: The issue of transparency in the editorial policies of scientific journals has become increasingly significant in the context of advancing international open access standards, as regulated by COPE, OASPA, WAME, and DOAJ principles. The openness and accessibility of information on a journal’s website, along with the proper design of publications themselves, determine not only the quality and reproducibility of research but also the broader scientific community’s trust in the journal’s editorial policy. However, the practical implementation of transparency depends heavily on the consistent application of stated principles at the level of author requirements and publications.
Purpose: To assess how well COPE, OASPA, WAME, and DOAJ principles are reflected in the editorial policies of international (Scopus Q1) and Russian scientific journals in the field of biotechnology and food research, with particular focus on openness about research methodologies, provision of raw data, and website design that ensures transparency at all stages of the publication process.
Materials and Methods: A total of 30 international journals indexed in Scopus (Q1) and 30 Russian journals (including those in Scopus and the highest-ranked by RSCI data) were analyzed. The study examined official journal websites, editorial policies, author guidelines, as well as the actual requirements for methodological disclosure and raw data provision. Additional attention was paid to site design elements, including the availability of detailed instructions and templates, as well as how each journal’s open access policy is presented through its interface and structure.
Results: It was found that international journals and some Russian journals indexed in Scopus demonstrate a more comprehensive level of transparency: standards for methodological disclosure, publication of raw data, and adherence to COPE, OASPA, WAME, and DOAJ principles are explicitly prescribed and consistently applied. These journals offer clear instructions on their websites, emphasizing the need for detailed methods descriptions and open data access. In contrast, among Russian journals not indexed by international databases, there is variability in the implementation of declared principles: despite efforts to update editorial policies, some journals do not fully translate transparency requirements into practice, which is evident in incomplete methodological information and limited online information regarding open access principles.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate a positive trend in the integration of open access and transparency principles into the editorial policies of journals in biotechnology and food research. The process is carried out most consistently in international journals and Russian journals indexed in international scientific databases. Nevertheless, further development of transparency requires standardizing requirements for methodological descriptions and open data, as well as fully reflecting these standards through the journal’s website design and layout, thereby strengthening the scientific community’s trust and enhancing the quality of published research.