• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
Найдено 9 публикаций
Сортировка:
по названию
по году
Статья
Smith R. T., Mirkin B., Muchnik I. Journal of Computational Biology. 1995. No. 2(4).
Добавлено: 1 ноября 2010
Статья
Kertesz-Farkas A., Dombi J. Journal of Computational Biology. 2009.
Добавлено: 19 января 2021
Статья
Nurk S., Bankevich A., Antipov D. et al. Journal of Computational Biology. 2013. Vol. 20. No. 10. P. 714-737.
Добавлено: 21 марта 2014
Статья
Mirkin B., Eulenstein O., Vingron M. Journal of Computational Biology. 1995. No. 5(1).
Добавлено: 29 октября 2010
Статья
Delfino F., Porozov Y., Stepanov Eugene et al. Journal of Computational Biology. 2020. Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 189-199.
Добавлено: 18 ноября 2020
Статья
Pham S. K., Antipov D., Sirotkin Alexander et al. Journal of Computational Biology. 2013. Vol. 20. No. 4. P. 359-371.
Добавлено: 21 марта 2014
Статья
Cheloshkina K., Bzhikhatlov I., Poptsova M. Journal of Computational Biology. 2021. Vol. 28. No. 7. P. 716-731.

Cancer genomes are susceptible to multiple rearrangements by deleting, inserting, and translocating genomic regions. Recently, the problem of finding determinants of breakpoint formations was approached with machine learning methods; however, unlike cancer point mutations, breakpoint prediction appeared to be a more difficult task, and various machine learning models did not achieve high prediction power often slightly exceeding the threshold of random guessing. This raised the question of whether the breakpoints are random noise in cancer mutagenesis or there exist determinants in structural mutagenesis. In the present study, we investigated randomness in cancer breakpoint genome distributions through the power of machine learning models to predict breakpoint hot spots. We divided all cancer types into three groups by degree of randomness in their breakpoint formation. We tested different density thresholds and explored the bias in hot spot definition. We also compared prediction of hot spots versus individual breakpoints. We found that hot spots are considerably better predicted than individual breakpoints; however, some individual breakpoints can also be predicted with a satisfactory power, and thus, it is not proper to filter them from analyses. We demonstrated that positive-unlabeled learning can provide insights into insufficiency of cancer data sets, which are not always reflected by data set sizes. Overall, the present results support the view that cancer breakpoint landscape can be represented by predictable dense breakpoint regions and scattered individual breakpoints, which are not all random noise, but some are generated by detectable mechanism.

Добавлено: 10 сентября 2021
Статья
Pirogov S., et a., Gelfand M. S. Journal of Computational Biology. 2016. Vol. 23. No. 9. P. 711-717.
Добавлено: 13 марта 2017
Статья
Bankevich A., Nurk S., Antipov D. et al. Journal of Computational Biology. 2012. Vol. 19. No. 5. P. 455-477.

The lion's share of bacteria in various environments cannot be cloned in the laboratory and thus cannot be sequenced using existing technologies. A major goal of single-cell genomics is to complement gene-centric metagenomic data with whole-genome assemblies of uncultivated organisms. Assembly of single-cell data is challenging because of highly non-uniform read coverage as well as elevated levels of sequencing errors and chimeric reads. We describe SPAdes, a new assembler for both single-cell and standard (multicell) assembly, and demonstrate that it improves on the recently released E+V−SC assembler (specialized for single-cell data) and on popular assemblers Velvet and SoapDeNovo (for multicell data). SPAdes generates single-cell assemblies, providing information about genomes of uncultivatable bacteria that vastly exceeds what may be obtained via traditional metagenomics studies. SPAdes is available online (http://bioinf.spbau.ru/spades). It is distributed as open source software.

Добавлено: 13 февраля 2013