• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
Найдено 6 публикаций
Сортировка:
по названию
по году
Статья
Avtonomov V. S. Journal of Business Ethics. 2006. Vol. 66. No. 1. P. 3-9.
Добавлено: 2 декабря 2009
Статья
Brieger S., Francoeur C., Welzel C. et al. Journal of Business Ethics. 2019. Vol. 155. No. 2. P. 495-511.
Добавлено: 7 апреля 2017
Статья
de Leeuw A., Valois P., Morin A. J. et al. Journal of Business Ethics. 2013.
Добавлено: 16 ноября 2013
Статья
Lopez Iturriaga F. J., Meca G., Gaite T. Journal of Business Ethics. 2015.
We examine whether the behavior of institutional investors representatives on boards leads to observable differences in corporate finance. We find that directors representing pressure-sensitive investors (i.e., banks and insurance companies) prefer lower financial leverage whereas pressure-resistant directors (i.e., mutual funds and pension funds) show no particular preference. When analysed separately, directors appointed by banks and insurance firms have different attitudes. Bank representatives on boards increase both the financial leverage and the banking debt. This result suggests that some types of institutional directors provide financial resources to the firms on whose board they sit, supporting the view that boards manage the uncertainty associated with strategic decision making and provide firms with preferential access to resources and financial expertise. This research has interesting academic and policy implications for the debate over the proper degree of institutional involvement in corporate governance. Different institutional investors have different agendas and incentives for corporate governance, and, therefore, both researchers and policy makers should no longer consider institutional investors as a whole. In addition, our paper calls for new research on the causes and implications of institutional investors involvement in the corporate governance of nonfinancial firms. This new research could require new insights on the dynamics within the boards and on the interplay among the knowledge, incentives and attitudes of quite different directors.  
Добавлено: 22 января 2016
Статья
Littrell R., Doran C. Journal of Business Ethics. 2013. Vol. 117. No. 2. P. 261-280.
Добавлено: 15 апреля 2018
Статья
Baek K. Journal of Business Ethics. 2015.

This paper examines the adoption of ISO 14001, which is known as the most famous voluntary environmental program. The data of this paper pertain to Korean [Throughout this paper, Korea refers to the Republic of Korea (South Korea)] firms in manufacturing industries from 1996 to 2011. Event-history modeling to examine firms’ adoption of ISO 14001 finds that both resource-based factors and institutional factors have influenced the diffusion of ISO 14001 in Korea. By exploring time-related effects, I also find that while resource-based factors are important in the early periods of the diffusion, institutional factors become important in the later periods of the diffusion. This confirms the findings of previous studies that a firm’s motivation to adopt organizational policies varies according to different diffusion periods. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of what this study tells us about the institutional context of ISO 14001 in Korea and Asia more broadly. © 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Добавлено: 10 сентября 2015