Нужна ли третейскому суду объективная беспристрастность? Комментарий к определению Судебной коллегии по экономическим спорам ВС РФ от 21 ноября 2022 года № 304-ЭС22-6536

Вестник экономического правосудия Российской Федерации. 2023. № 3 (109). С. 4–16.

Galperin M.

The article traces the evolution of state justice approaches to the practice of so-called ‘corporate’ arbitration courts. Despite the fact that in the commented ruling the Supreme Court leveled the concept of objective impartiality that had existed since the time of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian Federation and took a pro-arbitration position regarding the competence of an arbitration institution affiliated with one of the parties to the dispute, in general, the problem of counteracting ‘pocket’ arbitration remains relevant and requires a decision in the statute law, and not in court practice. Otherwise, the balance between arbitration and state courts restored as a result of the latest arbitration reform may again be disrupted. The author also draws attention to the undiscovered potential of art. 46 of the Law on Arbitration, which already allows the courts to assess whether there is a conflict of interest in the activities of an arbitration institution.

Keywords: третейский суд, арбитражное соглашение