Василий Татищев, “искусной архитект” Фридриха Барбароссы и кто-то третий

ВИВЛIОθИКА: E-Journal of Eighteenth-Century Russian Studies. 2021. № 9. С. 69–100.

Boytsov M.

The author attempts to find out under what circumstances Vasilii Tatishchev could have come to his
assertion that Emperor Frederick I Barbarossa had sent an architect to Andrei Bogoliubskii, prince of
Vladimir. Despite the wide popularity of this Tatishchev's argument among today's historians of
architecture, it has never become the subject of a special study. Meanwhile, this case allows a deep look
into the specific research methods of a historian in the first half of the eighteenth century, as well as into
his narrative strategies and value orientations.

Keywords: история исторической науки, историческое сознание, Андрей Боголюбский, Василий Никитич Татищев, history of historical knowledge, historical consciosness, Успенский собор во Владимире, history of historical scholarship, Владимиро-Суздальская архитектура, Фридрих I Барбаросса, Золотые ворота во Владимире, Vasiliy Tatishchev, Golden Gate, Vladimir, Dormition Cathedral, Vladimir, Andrey Bogolyubsky