Парламентская процедура как вид юридической процедуры

Правоприменение. 2021. Т. 5. № 2. С. 170–184.

Koshel A.

The article examines the interpretation of the doctrine of legal procedure in relation to the functioning of parliament. The author draws attention to the fact that at the present stage of the development of the theory of law, parliamentary bureaucracy has developed procedural social relations, which are not only regulated de facto, but must also be regulated de jure by the procedural norms, which confirms the conclusions of the authors of the broadapproach to the theory of legal process. However, there will be a window of opportunity for the supporters of the narrow approach in the parliamentary process. In accordance with the conclusions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, which have prerequisites even in the works of Montesquieu, the parliament, as an institution with jurisdictional powers, must comply with the appropriate procedure in their implementation. Hence, the author deduces the need for further improvement of the doctrine of parliamentary procedure and the need for clear and proper regulation of the legal procedures in the parliament, which has the ultimate goal to observe and to implement rights, freedoms, and constitutional guarantees of participants of the parliamentary process.

Keywords: Совет Федерации, Государственная Дума, полномочия, State Duma, jurisdiction, юрисдикция, парламент, powers, parliament, legal procedure, юридический процесс, Федеральное Собрание Российской Федерации, парламентская процедура, парламентский процесс, юридическая процедура, parliamentary procedure, Legal Process, parliamentary process, Council of Federation, Federal Assembly