Последующий судебный контроль иностранных судебных решений, не требующих принудительного исполнения: Комментарий к определению Судебной коллегии по экономическим спорам ВС РФ от 25.06.2020 № 305-ЭС19-24914

Вестник экономического правосудия Российской Федерации. 2020. № 10. С. 4–16.

Фокин Е. А., Шайхутдинова А. И.

This comment analyses the Russian Supreme Court’s judgment which for the first time provides a relatively detailed position of the highest authority on the application of article 245.1 of the Russian Arbitrazh Procedure Code. This article allows to object to the recognition of foreign judgments that do not require enforcement. However, the rules of procedure do not contain a clear and specific algorithm for considering such objections. Hence, the position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation was much waited for.
The main idea of the judgment is the need to ensure the right of judicial protection and the adversarial principle in cases of recognition and enforcement of foreign judicial decisions. Generally agreeing with this idea, the article illustrates that in this case there are no signs of error in the judicial acts. In this regard, the legal position expressed by the Judicial Chamber for Economic Disputes can be considered as correct in essence, but irrelevant to the case under consideration.

Keywords: состязательность, право на судебную защиту, the right to judicial protection, the adversarial principle, признание и приведение в исполнение иностранных судебных решений

Publication based on the results of: Enforcement of the International Judgments in a Multipolar World (2020)